Browse Articles
Discover research articles across all indexed journals
Novel strategy for boosting thermoelectric performance of organic materials with low electrical conductivity
Roll-to-Roll AgNWs Networks/Ag Finger by Self-Masking Protection for Large-Area Monolithic Flexible Organic Solar Cells
Dengue Suppression by Male Wolbachia-Infected Mosquitoes
‘RAMmageddon’ hits labs: AI-driven memory shortage is impacting science
A boosting strategy based on feature mimicking with attention for visual anomaly detection
Acquisitive plants exhibit stronger phenological shifts in response to warming: insights from meta-analysis and long-term monitoring
Abstract As climate warming accelerates, shifts in plant phenology are reshaping the functioning and stability of terrestrial ecosystems. While the roles of climatic drivers in shaping phenological responses to warming are well established, the influence of intrinsic plant functional traits remains poorly understood. Here, we combine two complementary approaches through a meta-analysis of 124 field warming experiments and an analysis of long-term phenological monitoring networks (CPON and USA‑NPN) to evaluate phenological responses to warming across a spectrum of resource-use strategies in seasonally cold biomes. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that resource-acquisitive plants, characterized by higher nutrient concentrations and thinner leaves, show significantly stronger phenological responses to experimental warming. This pattern is observed consistently across both leaf-out in spring and senescence in autumn. These results from meta-analysis are further supported by two long-term observational datasets, which also show more pronounced phenological shifts in acquisitive species under long-term warming. Our findings present a trait-climate integration framework that extends beyond conventional environmental drivers, providing a mechanistic foundation to enhance the accuracy of forecasts for plant responses to climate change.
Prime Editing for p47 <sup>phox</sup> -Deficient Chronic Granulomatous Disease
Lake bathymetric reconstruction and water storage estimation method based on terrain feature similarity
Screening and regulation of nanozyme activity via liquid metals coined electron rearrangement and phase engineering
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy or Aspirin after Coronary Bypass Surgery
Preparation of Co–Ce–Ru/γ-Al2O3 catalyst for degradation rhodamine B in dye wastewater
Bleb-based extravasation uses conserved morphodynamics but divergent calcium control
Case 28-2025: A Man with Abdominal Pain, Fever, and Hypoxemia
Xq28 duplication not F8 inversion: integrated genetic reanalysis redefines prenatal carrier diagnosis
In Situ Formed Pt–Ga Hetero Duo-Atomic Catalyst for Efficient Hydrogen Storage in N-Heterocycles
Challenges in the standardization of in vitro cytotoxicity assays for comparative risk assessment of cold atmospheric pressure plasma devices
Abstract Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) has emerged as a promising therapeutic modality in wound healing, with multiple devices now certified for clinical use. However, the constructive and functional diversity of CAP technologies poses significant challenges for cross-device comparison in preclinical in vitro studies. In this study, we evaluated how device-specific parameters and experimental conditions influence cytotoxic outcomes across different CAP technologies. Using L929, GM00637, and HaCaT cells, we compared direct treatment with a plasma jet (kINPen ® MED) and a surface micro-discharge device (plasma care ® ), revealing significant differences in the reduction of metabolic activity under otherwise identical conditions. Assessment of treatment geometry—specifically the radius of circular motion of the plasma jet—significantly affects metabolic activity, even at identical exposure times. To standardize conditions across devices, we further investigated an indirect treatment approach using a metal grid to generate plasma-conditioned PBS. However, we found a non-linear relationship between liquid volume, treatment time, and biological outcome. Moreover, indirect treatment excludes short-lived reactive species and non-chemical plasma components, limiting its biological relevance. Our findings demonstrate that neither direct nor indirect treatment protocols reliably enable cross-device comparisons in vitro. We therefore advocate for transparent, comprehensive reporting of all device and experimental variables, rather than pursuing a single standardized protocol. This enables meaningful data integration and cross-study comparisons, even when protocols differ.