Continental breakup–driven uplift instigated East Antarctic Ice Sheet formation

T Thomas M. Gernon (School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.) T Thea K. Hincks (School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.) P Philip Goodwin (School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.) G Guy J. G. Paxman (Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK.) S Sascha Brune (GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany.) E Eelco J. Rohling (School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.) D Derek Keir (School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.) J Jean Braun (GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany.)

Abstract

Why Antarctica became glaciated ∼34 million years ago (Ma) remains debated, as relatively warm climates and sea temperatures appear inconsistent with ice sheet formation. Although a critical decline in CO 2 is considered primarily responsible, evidence suggests that other factors were important, too. We investigated whether regional topographic uplift, rooted in Jurassic continental breakup and mantle-surface feedbacks, enabled nucleation of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS). By integrating geodynamic-topographic models with ice sheet and energy balance models, we show that progressive plateau growth in East Antarctica, including Eocene uplift of the Gamburtsev Mountains, pushed landscapes above the threshold for ice sheet nucleation by ∼45 Ma. Uplift enabled EAIS growth under warmer-than-expected climates, producing hemispheric asymmetry in early glaciation and reconciling Oligocene polar warmth with the onset of the modern icehouse world.

Article Details

Journal Science
Volume / Issue Vol. 393, Issue 6806
Published July 02, 2026
ISSN 0036-8075
Publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science

Journal Info

Science

American Association for the Advancement of Science

ISSN: 0036-8075 Social Sciences

Authors (8)

T

Thomas M. Gernon

School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

T

Thea K. Hincks

School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

P

Philip Goodwin

School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

G

Guy J. G. Paxman

Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK.

S

Sascha Brune

GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany.

E

Eelco J. Rohling

School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

D

Derek Keir

School of Ocean & Earth Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

J

Jean Braun

GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, Potsdam, Germany.