Browse Articles

Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Resected Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm–Derived Pancreatic Cancer: Addressing Statistical and Methodological Concerns in Survival Analysis

A novel foldable metamaterial for application in the pipeline pressure vessel with a static deformation, strain and stress analysis

Long-Term Follow-Up and Overall Survival in NRG258, a Randomized Phase III Trial of Chemoradiation Versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma

This randomized phase III trial aimed to determine whether treatment with cisplatin and volume-directed radiation followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel for four cycles (chemoradiotherapy [C-RT]) increased recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) when compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel for six cycles (chemotherapy [CT]) in locally advanced endometrial cancer (UC). Previously reported results showed that C-RT did not improve RFS compared with CT. Here we report the final OS analysis. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage III-IVA UC or stage I/II serous or clear cell UC and positive cytology were enrolled. The primary objective was RFS. Secondary objectives were OS, toxicity, and quality of life. Cumulative probabilities of OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Subgroup analyses of treatment effect for FIGO stage, age, race, gross residual disease, histology, lymph-vascular space invasion, and body mass index were performed. In total, 813 patients were randomly assigned (407 C-RT and 406 CT). The median follow-up was 112 months. Median OS was not achieved in either arm. The stratified hazard ratio for death comparing C-RT versus CT was 1.05 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.34, log-rank two-sided P value = .72). None of the factors analyzed predicted OS benefit from C-RT. Although C-RT reduced the rate of local recurrence compared with CT, it did not increase OS or RFS in stage III/IVA UC.

Willingness of healthcare professionals in China to continue participating in and recommend telemedicine post COVID-19 pandemic

Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Recurrent Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Trial

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in treating recurrent small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS In this trial, patients with recurrent small HCC (single lesion ≤5 cm) were randomly assigned to receive either SBRT or RFA. The primary end point was local progression-free survival (LPFS), and secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local control rate, and safety. RESULTS Between August 2019 and April 2022, 166 patients were assigned to SBRT (n = 83) and RFA (n = 83) groups. After a median follow-up time of 42.8 and 42.9 months in the SBRT and RFA groups, respectively, SBRT demonstrated a significantly better LPFS than that of RFA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.87]; P = .014). The 2-year LPFS rates were 92.7% (95% CI, 87.3 to 98.5) with SBRT and 75.8% (95% CI, 67.2 to 85.7) with RFA. The median PFS time of the SBRT and RFA groups was 37.6 (95% CI, 26.0 to 49.2) and 27.6 (95% CI, 20.3 to 34.8) months, respectively (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.50 to 1.15]; P = .190). Nine patients in the SBRT group and 10 in the RFA group died during the follow-up. The 2-year OS rates were 97.6% (95% CI, 94.3 to 100.0) in the SBRT group and 93.9% (95% CI, 88.9 to 99.2) in the RFA group (HR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.37 to 2.22]; P = .830). The incidences of both acute and late adverse events were comparable between the groups ( P = .436 and P = .715, respectively). CONCLUSION SBRT achieved better LPFS than that of RFA in patients with single recurrent HCC ≤5 cm, especially in HCC ≤2 cm, whereas PFS, OS, and safety were comparable between the two treatments.

Efficient uremic toxins adsorption from simulated blood by immobilization of metal organic frameworks anchored Sephadex beads

Abstract The current study outlines the removal of Creatinine, p-Cresol sulfate, and Hippuric acid from simulated blood using three new granules: Fe-BTC@Sephadex, Cu-BTC@Sephadex, and Co-BTC@Sephadex. Beads were used to adsorbed toxic chemicals, and the effects of various experimental parameters were examined in the adsorption optimization process. The framework’s adsorption isotherms were explained by the application of the Freundlich and Langmuir models. The kinetics of adsorption is represented by a pseudo-first and second-order equation. The morphology and structure of the Fe-BTC@ Sephadex, Co-BTC@ Sephadex, and Cu-BTC@Sephadex beads were investigated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The adsorption capacities for creatinine were 545.69, 339.76, and 189.88 mg/g for Fe-BTC@ Sephadex, Cu-BTC@ Sephadex, and Co-BTC@ Sephadex, respectively, according to the results; the corresponding adsorption capacities for hippuric acid were 323.78, 206.79, and 68.059 mg/g, and the maximum adsorption capacities for p-Cresol sulfate were 122.65, 71.268, and 40.347 mg/g, respectively. These were, in fact, promising findings that have implications for an industrial-scale transportable artificial kidney.

Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Nonrandomized, Open-Label, International, Multicenter Phase I/II Study

PURPOSE Approximately 50% of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have primary or acquired resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade, which may be overcome using combination immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody. We present results from the recurrent/metastatic MCC cohort in CheckMate 358, a nonrandomized, multicohort, phase I/II study of nivolumab (NIVO) with or without ipilimumab (IPI) in virus-associated cancers (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02488759 ). METHODS ICI-naïve patients with recurrent/metastatic MCC and 0-2 previous systemic therapies were administered NIVO monotherapy at 240 mg once every 2 weeks or combination therapy with NIVO 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks + IPI 1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks. The primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Sixty-eight patients received NIVO (n = 25) or NIVO + IPI (n = 43). The objective response rate (95% CI) and median DOR (95% CI), respectively, were 60% (38.7 to 78.9) and 60.6 months (16.7 to not applicable [NA]) with NIVO and 58% (42.1 to 73) and 25.9 months (10.4 to NA) with NIVO + IPI. The median PFS (95% CI) and OS (95% CI), respectively, were 21.3 (9.2 to 62.5) and 80.7 (23.3 to NA) months with NIVO and 8.4 (3.7 to 24.3) and 29.8 (8.5 to 48.3) months with NIVO + IPI. The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events was 28% with NIVO and 47% with the combination. CONCLUSION This nonrandomized study showed frequent and durable responses with both NIVO and NIVO + IPI in patients with ICI-naïve advanced MCC. However, it did not show improvement in efficacy with the combination, thus contradicting previous study reports that had suggested clinical benefit with combination ICI. A randomized trial of NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy is warranted.

Artificial intelligence to enhance the diagnosis of ocular surface squamous neoplasia

Abstract To provide an artificial intelligence (AI) method using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) to differentiate ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) from other lesions and compare the performance of well-known AI-related solutions. A dataset of 2,774 IVCM images, comprising OSSN and other ocular surface diseases was used to train three deep learning models: ResNet50V2, Yolov8x, and VGG19. These models were trained to identify OSSN-related lesions by recognizing specific visual features, including the “starry-sky” pattern, hyperkeratosis, mitotic figures and irregularly shaped epithelial cells. To mitigate class imbalance, a novel square-based data augmentation strategy was employed. Additionally, we implemented a few-shot learning model to enhance the precision of rare symptoms, such as mitosis. To enhance model interpretation, Shapley values and Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) analysis were employed to explain decision-making processes. The AI models demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing healthy tissues from pathological ones, achieving over 90% accuracy across all models. In our binary classification task, all AI models had accuracy above 97% (precision ≥ 98%, recall ≥ 85%, F1 score ≥ 92%). The model achieved lower accuracy in 4 class labeled classification. Aggregation of cell-level results provided the best performance with an F1 score of 100%. The models successfully identified patient-specific features in IVCM images, suggesting that these images can act as “fingerprints”. Our AI model utilizing IVCM was able to classify OSSN with high accuracy. Moreover, cell-level classification results could be backpropagated to image-level and patient-level. The patient-specific information within IVCM images offers promise for personalized diagnostics and treatment monitoring in ocular oncology.

De-Escalation Strategies With Immune Checkpoint Blockers in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Do We Already Have Enough Evidence?

Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) have revolutionized the treatment of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, one-dose-fits-all maximalist regimens have been considered the standard of care, with ICBs administered at flat doses regardless of patients’ weight. Treatment duration with ICBs is often arbitrary across stages, ranging from a fixed time point to until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. However, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ICBs differ significantly from those of traditional cytotoxic drugs and the approved and selected doses on the basis of the maximum tolerated dose are often overestimated as there is limited evidence supporting a direct relationship between therapeutic intensity and outcomes. This can lead to overtreatment of patients, resulting in an increased risk of toxicity without enhanced efficacy. In addition, the use of these drugs is associated with significant costs that burden the global health care system and exacerbate disparities in access to care. De-escalating treatment by reducing the dose, duration, and frequency of administration of ICBs could optimize treatment efficacy, reduce toxicities, improve patients' quality of life, and even decrease costs. Ultimately, de-escalation strategies may help to reduce treatment inequalities and to improve drug access worldwide. The aim of this review is to summarize and discuss the main issues and challenges regarding the de-escalation of ICBs in patients with NSCLC, focusing on dose-intensity reduction and treatment duration selection. Moreover, we assess the economic impact of implementing de-escalation approaches.

High disease activity correlate with decreased serum calcium in systemic lupus erythematosus

Targeting CD30 in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Where Does It Fit in?

Author Correction: Uncovering the impact of outliers on clusters’ evolution in temporal data-sets: an empirical analysis

Brentuximab Vedotin Combination for Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE In patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), brentuximab vedotin (BV) as monotherapy or combined with either lenalidomide (Len) or rituximab (R) has demonstrated efficacy with acceptable safety. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV + Len + R versus placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. METHODS ECHELON-3 is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trial comparing BV + Len + R with placebo + Len + R in patients with R/R DLBCL. Patients received BV or placebo once every 3 weeks, Len once daily, and R once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 134 OS events, with two-sided P = .0232 as the efficacy boundary. RESULTS Patients (N = 230) were randomly assigned to receive BV + Len + R (n = 112) or placebo + Len + R (n = 118). Two patients in the placebo arm did not receive treatment. With a median follow-up of 16.4 months, the median OS was 13.8 months with BV + Len + R versus 8.5 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.89]; two-sided P = .009). The median PFS was 4.2 months with BV + Len + R versus 2.6 months with placebo + Len + R (hazard ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73]; two-sided P < .001). The ORR was 64% ([95% CI, 55 to 73]; two-sided P < .001) with BV + Len + R and 42% (95% CI, 33 to 51) with placebo + Len + R; complete response rates were 40% and 19%, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 97% of patients in both arms. In both arms, the most common treatment-emergent AEs were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia. CONCLUSION BV + Len + R demonstrated a statistically significant survival benefit with a manageable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with R/R DLBCL.

A mode of action protein based approach that characterizes the relationships among most major diseases

Structure and mechanism of vitamin-K-dependent γ-glutamyl carboxylase

What Is the Optimal Locoregional Approach for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma?

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors’ suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology , to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Multidisciplinary characterization of embarrassment through behavioral and acoustic modeling

Fingerprinting the recovery of Antarctic ozone

Molecular basis of vitamin-K-driven γ-carboxylation at the membrane interface

Randomized, Phase III Trial of Mixed Formulation of Fosrolapitant and Palonosetron (HR20013) in Preventing Cisplatin-Based Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: PROFIT

PURPOSE Mixed formulation of fosrolapitant and palonosetron (PALO), HR20013, is a novel fixed-dose intravenous antiemetic combination that could simultaneously antagonize neurokinin-1 and 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptors. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HR20013 plus dexamethasone (DEX) versus fosaprepitant (FAPR) plus PALO + DEX for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). METHODS This is a noninferiority study. Chemotherapy-naïve patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive HR20013 (day 1) or FAPR + PALO (day 1) before each cycle of cisplatin-based HEC (two cycles in total), together with oral DEX (day 1-4). The primary end point was overall (0-120 hours) complete response (CR; no vomiting/no rescue therapy) rate in cycle 1. The key secondary end point was CR rate at the beyond delayed phase (120-168 hours) in cycle 1. RESULTS Three hundred seventy-three patients were enrolled to receive HR20013 + DEX and 377 to FAPR + PALO + DEX. The overall CR rate in cycle 1 was 77.7% for HR20013 + DEX and 78.2% for FAPR + PALO + DEX (difference = –0.9% [95% CI, –6.7 to 5.0]; one-sided P < .01), demonstrating that HR20013 + DEX was noninferior to FAPR + PALO + DEX. The superiority of HR20013 + DEX over FAPR + PALO + DEX in CR rate at the beyond delayed phase in cycle 1 was not met (90.3% v 86.5%; two-sided P = .11). In cycle 2, HR20013 + DEX showed greater proportions of patients reporting no impact on daily life at the delayed (24-120 hours) and beyond delayed phases compared with FAPR + PALO + DEX. The incidences of treatment-related adverse events were 35.7% during cycle 1 and 42.1% during entire study for HR20013 + DEX, versus 38.2% and 44.0% for FAPR + PALO + DEX. CONCLUSION HR20013 + DEX was noninferior to FAPR + PALO + DEX for preventing HEC-CINV and well tolerated, with the potential to reduce the impact of CINV on daily life.