ZAP trial: MRD-guided chemotherapy and maintenance de-escalation with zanubrutinib-g-CHOP in high-risk FL (Phase II)
Abstract
Abstract Background: Patients with untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) and intermediate-high risk FLIPI scores (≥2) face poor outcomes: 5-year PFS is ~50% with standard G-CHOP plus 2-year obinutuzumab maintenance, accompanied by significant toxicity (infection, cytopenias, secondary malignancies and quality-of-life deterioration). Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is a rational therapeutic strategy, as BTK signaling drives FL pathogenesis and tumor microenvironment interactions. Zanubrutinib-a next-generation, highly selective BTK inhibitor-synergizes with anti-CD20 therapy and demonstrates clinical activity in relapsed/refractory FL. The phase II ZAP (Zanubrutinib-Adapted Protocol) trial pioneers a response-adapted de-escalation paradigm integrating zanubrutinib into frontline therapy, aiming to maximize early molecular remissions while reducing treatment burden in this vulnerable population. Methods: From April 2024 to December 2024, this phase II trial (NCT06474481) enrolled 32 untreated FL patients (FLIPI 2-5) receiving 4 cycles of zanubrutinib (160mg BID) + standard G-CHOP with mandatory pegfilgrastim prophylaxis. Response-adapted therapy post-cycle 4: patients achieving CR (Deauville 1-3 + MRD negativity) initiated abbreviated 12-month maintenance (zanubrutinib + obinutuzumab); others received 2 additional induction cycles. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed via dual-modality tracking: tumor-informed ctDNA (PhasED-seq, 10⁻⁶ sensitivity) at baseline/C2/C4/C6/q6mo maintenance and ClonoSEQ® NGS (BM, 10⁻⁶). Correlative studies included baseline whole-exome sequencing, serial immune profiling (35-plex CyTOF on PBMCs), and patient-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30/LY20). Primary endpoint was CR rate after 4 cycles; secondary endpoints included MRD negativity, PFS, and safety. Results: As of July 25, 2025, all 32 enrolled patients completed at least 4 cycles of zanubrutinib-enhanced G-CHOP, demonstrating striking efficacy. The primary endpoint was surpassed with a CR rate of 84.4% (27/32; 95% CI: 68.3-93.1%) after just 4 cycles. MRD negativity, assessed through dual-modality tracking, confirmed profound molecular responses: 90.6% (29/32) achieved ctDNA clearance, while 87.5% (28/32) had bone marrow MRD eradication. Notably, 84.4% of patients (27/32) showed concordant negativity in both assays, establishing a robust biomarker-defined subgroup with exceptional outcomes (97% 12-month PFS). Early molecular responders-those achieving ctDNA negativity by cycle 2 (n=24)-universally attained CR by cycle 4, compared to only 37.5% (3/8) of delayed clearers (p<0.001), validating C2 MRD as a critical decision point for de-escalation. High-risk subgroups benefited uniformly: patients with bulky disease (>7 cm, n=14) achieved an 85.7% CR rate (12/14), while those with FLIPI 4-5 (n=11) reached 81.8% CR (9/11). Patient-reported outcomes (EORTC QLQ-C30) revealed clinically meaningful improvements, with Global Health Status scores rising from 58.2 at baseline to 83.6 post-induction (Δ25.4, p<0.001)-76% of participants rated their treatment experience as “much better” than standard regimens. The safety profile supported the de-escalation strategy. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 21.9% (7/32), with only 6.3% (2/32) developing febrile neutropenia-attributable to mandatory pegfilgrastim prophylaxis. BTK inhibitor-related adverse events were mild (grade 1-2 bruising: 5/32; atrial fibrillation: 1/32), and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: The ZAP trial demonstrates that zanubrutinib-enhanced G-CHOP induces high CR (84.4%) and MRD negativity (>90%) rates in high-risk FL, enabling early chemotherapy de-escalation (omitting 33% of cycles) and shortened maintenance (12 months) without compromising efficacy (12-month PFS: 97%). This response-adapted, MRD-guided paradigm redefines frontline FL therapy by replacing fixed-duration treatment with a precision approach.
Article Details
Authors (8)
Zhao Peiqi
1Department of Lymphoma, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
Lanfang Li
Zhengzi Qian
1Department of Lymphoma / State Key Laboratory of Druggability Evaluation and Systematic Translational Medicine, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, the Sino-US Center for Lymphoma and Leukemia Research, Tianjin, China
Wei Li
Shiyong Zhou
8Department of Hematology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjing, China
Lihua Qiu
Xianming Liu
Institutes of Biomedical Sciences and Department of Chemistry, Fudan University
Huilai Zhang