Which systemic regimen to choose in cisplatin-ineligible patients with concurrent radiation therapy for head and neck cancers: carboplatin/5-flurouracil or carboplatin/paclitaxel?

P Parth J. Sampat (Renown Health, Reno, NV) D Devashish Desai (1SUNY Upstate Medical University, Hematology and Oncology, Syracuse, United States) D Deevyashali Parekh (2SUNY Upstate University, Department of Internal Medicine, Syracuse, United States) S Stephanie Niforatos (SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY) A Alanna Siegenthaler (1SUNY Upstate Medical University, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Syracuse, United States) N Nimisha Srivastava (SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY) B Bhaskara Reddy Madhira (SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY)

Abstract

6090 Background: For locally advanced head and neck cancer, concurrent chemotherapy-radiation therapy (ChemoRT) is mainstay of treatment. Carboplatin and 5-Flurouracil (CF) is category 1 recommendation per NCCN guidelines and used mainly in Cisplatin ineligible patients. In this study we aim to compare the outcomes of concurrent radiation therapy with either CF or Carboplatin/Paclitaxel (CP). Methods: TrinetX, a global federated research network that provides a dataset of electronic medical records from different healthcare organizations (HCOs), was utilized. Initial query was made to isolate patients who had head and neck cancer (ICD 10 codes C02, C03, C04, C05, C06, C09, C10, C12, C13, C14, C32) and received radiation therapy, concurrently either with CP or CF. Further, propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out to match age, sex, and race. Outcomes of all-cause mortality (ACM), sepsis, septic shock, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting (NV), diarrhea were evaluated. Results: 8,310 cases were identified who received ChemoRT, of whom 26% (2,160) received CF. Caucasians were the predominant race in both groups, but Asians received more CF (14% vs 4%, p<0.0001). Patients receiving CF were younger (61.4 ± 9.87 vs 63.5 ± 10.4, p<0.0001). It was seen that patients who received CF had higher ACM rate (51.54% vs 48.52%, p=0.0163; median overall survival (OS) 571 days vs 781 days, p=0.0007). Risk of sepsis (21.24% vs 17.05%, p<0.0001), septic shock (7.11% vs 5.24%, p=0.0014), neutropenia (21.98% vs 17.05%, p<0.0001), NV (32.79% vs 28.58%, p=0.0003) was more with CF compared to CP, while no difference in neuropathy and diarrhea. After PSM, though elevated but no statistical difference was seen in ACM (50.95% vs 48.75%, p=0.1593), septic shock (7.09% vs 5.77%, p=0.0852), and neutropenia (22.10% vs 19.66%, p=0.0544), while there was still difference in sepsis (21.17% vs 17.8%, p=0.0065), and NV (33.74% vs 29.73%, p=0.0059). Conclusions: Concurrent chemoRT with CP offers similar efficacy compared to CF, with less toxicity and can be established as to go chemotherapy regimen with radiation therapy in patients who are ineligible for Cisplatin.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 6090-6090
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (7)

P

Parth J. Sampat

Renown Health, Reno, NV

D

Devashish Desai

1SUNY Upstate Medical University, Hematology and Oncology, Syracuse, United States

D

Deevyashali Parekh

2SUNY Upstate University, Department of Internal Medicine, Syracuse, United States

S

Stephanie Niforatos

SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

A

Alanna Siegenthaler

1SUNY Upstate Medical University, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Syracuse, United States

N

Nimisha Srivastava

SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

B

Bhaskara Reddy Madhira

SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY