Water Oxidation to Hydrogen Peroxide Over a Super‐Aerophilic Graphite Catalyst
Abstract
Abstract Two‐electron water oxidation reaction (2e‐WOR) to produce hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) is an attractive anode reaction with several merits. It can be paired with several large‐scale cathode reactions that produce valuable chemical substances in an electrochemical cell. However, high‐performing and reliable 2e‐WOR anodic catalysts are yet to be fully developed. In this work, a rationally designed, inexpensive, robust, and selective graphite catalyst electrode is presented, made by following the key principle mechanisms of 2e‐WOR. First, an aerophilic graphite‐based electrode is created to leverage the challenges posed by the four‐electron WOR, where the generated O 2 from this reaction is kept onto the electrode surface to shift the O intermediates binding on graphite in the direction of improved H 2 O 2 generation. An initial improvement in H 2 O 2 selectivity of seven fold is observed, albeit with no improved H 2 O 2 generation rates. The stunted H 2 O 2 generation is ascribed to poor activity from pristine graphite, courtesy of less active sites and low intrinsic O 2 binding in the electrolyte environment. Second, to improve and balance graphite's activity and selectivity, the structure of graphite is altered via different elemental doping (with N, S, B, and P atoms), a method that allows the retention of the O 2 on the graphite surface. The super‐aerophilic B‐doped graphite catalyst (optimum) reaches a maximum Faraday efficiency (FE) of 60.6 ± 2.6% with a production rate of 26.7 ± 0.6 µmol min −1 cm −2 (85.9 ± 2.2 mA cm −2 partial current density) and excellent stability of over 120 h. In tandem, cathodic H 2 co‐production is demonstrated with an FE of above 90%. This approach demonstrates a rational approach to designing inexpensive and robust 2e‐WOR anode catalysts for H 2 O 2 and the possibility of its use in chemical co‐production at the cathode.
Article Details
Authors (17)
Umer Javed
UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia
Mike Tebyetekerwa
Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland 4072 Australia
Cheng Tang
Tsinghua Center for Green Chemical Engineering Electrification, Department of Chemical Engineering
Xiangkang Zeng
Zhuyuan Wang
UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation, School of Chemical Engineering
Kaige Sun
Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland 4072 Australia
Jindi Yang
Ifra Marriam
School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering Centre for Materials Science Faculty of Engineering Queensland University of Technology 2 George Street Brisbane Queensland 4000 Australia
Lijun Guo
Xin Sun
Aloka Kumar Sahu
UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia
Yanzhao Zhang
Nanomaterials Centre, School of Chemical Engineering and Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology
Arash Zamyadi
Department of Civil Engineering Monash University Clayton Victoria 3800 Australia
Aijun Du
School of Chemistry and Physics
Qin Li
Thomas E. Rufford
UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation School of Chemical Engineering The University of Queensland St Lucia Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia
Xiwang Zhang
UQ Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation, School of Chemical Engineering