Volrustomig monotherapy for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC: Substudy 2 of the eVOLVE-02 phase 2 study.
Abstract
6025 Background: Inhibition of PD-1 is an important part of standard of care treatment options for patients (pts) with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC, but prognosis remains poor and there is a need for novel regimens to improve outcomes. Dual PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibition has shown a trend towards improved survival vs the EXTREME regimen as first-line (1L) therapy in PD-L1-expressing R/M HNSCC. Volrustomig, a monovalent, bispecific, humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, inhibits PD-1 and CTLA-4, with increased CTLA-4 blockade on PD-1-positive activated T cells compared to PD-1-negative resting peripheral T cells. We report safety and efficacy from the planned interim analysis of substudy 2 of the phase 2 eVOLVE-02 (NCT06535607) study, investigating volrustomig monotherapy in pts with R/M HNSCC. Methods: Eligible pts had histologically or cytologically confirmed R/M HNSCC of the hypopharynx, oral cavity, larynx, or oropharynx (HP, OC, LX, OP), had ECOG performance status (PS) 0/1, and were either treatment-naïve in the 1L setting with confirmed PD-L1 positivity or had disease progression (PD) on/after a 1L platinum-containing regimen. Pts received IV volrustomig until PD (RECIST v1.1)/discontinuation criteria were met. Primary endpoints: safety and confirmed objective response rate (cORR). Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Data cutoff (DCO): August 15, 2025. Results: 23 pts with recurrent (n=12) or metastatic (n=11) HNSCC (7 HP, 8 OC, 4 LX, 4 OP) received volrustomig as 1L (n=12) or 2L (n=11) treatment. Median age was 61 years; 16 pts (69.6%) had PS 1; 19 (82.6%) had a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. Median duration of exposure was 2.1 months (range 0.7–6.4). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 91.3% of pts (30.4% grade 3/4, 34.8% serious TEAEs); treatment-related AEs per investigator were reported in 82.6% (8.7% grade 3/4, 4.3% serious AEs). No pts discontinued treatment due to AEs. Grade 5 AEs were reported in 13.0% of pts (none considered related to treatment). At DCO, median follow-up was 5.4 months. In pts with CPS ≥1: 5 had partial responses (3 LX, 1 HP, 1 OC); cORR was 26.3%; disease control rate was 52.6%. Median time to response was 2.6 months (IQR 1.4–2.8); responses were ongoing in 60% of responders at DCO. Blood RNA seq showed increased CTLA-4-associated immune proliferation/activation (Ki67/ICOS gene expression) with volrustomig on cycle 1, day 8 vs at baseline. Conclusions: Volrustomig monotherapy showed an acceptable safety profile and encouraging activity in pts with R/M HNSCC, warranting further clinical development. Volrustomig is under investigation in combination with chemotherapy as 1L treatment for R/M HNSCC in the phase 2 eVOLVE-02 substudy 3, and as consolidation monotherapy in locally advanced HNSCC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the phase 3 eVOLVE-HNSCC (NCT06129864) study. Clinical trial information: NCT06535607 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Ye Guo
Lei Liu
Shurong Zhang
National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University
Meiyu Fang
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
Yaqian Han
Song Qu
Peiguo Wang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin, China
Peng Zhang
Haijun Wu
Sufang Qiu
Man Hu
Zhigang Liu
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology
Jingjing Guo
Center for Clinical Research and Translational Medicine, Yangpu Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University
Rui Mao
Bingying Xie
Biometrics and Data Science, Oncology, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Shanghai, China
Xiaoling Zeng
Kunyu Yang