Ven+FluBu2 with ptcy/tac/MMF RIC transplant followed by venetoclax/azacitidine maintenance for high-risk MDS/AML
Abstract
Abstract Background: We previously demonstrated that incorporating venetoclax (Ven) into reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) chemotherapy for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with tacrolimus (Tac)/methotrexate (MTX) graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis followed by maintenance with azacitidine (Aza) and Ven was safe and associated with promising outcomes in older patients with high risk MDS/AML (Garcia Blood Adv 2021). BMT CTN 1703 findings indicate that post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) should be considered standard prophylaxis for older adults. Here, we report the safety of Ven plus fludarabine/busulfan (Ven+FluBu2) with PTCy/Tac/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) followed by Ven/Aza maintenance in patients with high risk MDS/AML. Methods: In this Phase 1 trial (NCT03613532), patients with an 8/8 HLA-matched donor and diagnosis of AML with <5% blasts (adverse ELN 2022) or MDS with ≤10% blasts (IPSS Intermediate-2/High, or TP53 mutation) received Ven+FluBu2 HCT, as previously described (Garcia Blood Adv 2021), with PTCy/Tac/MMF GVHD prophylaxis. Following neutrophil and platelet engraftment and in the absence of relapse or uncontrolled GVHD, maintenance therapy was initiated (days +42-90) with Ven 400 mg (days 1-14) and Aza 36 mg/m2 (days 1-5 by IV/SC). In exploratory analyses, we compare early outcomes in the current cohort (PTCy) with a previously reported cohort of Ven+FluBu2+Tac/MTX (MTX-cohort, n=27). Results: At 6/1/25 data-cut, 23 patients underwent Ven+FluBu2 HCT + PTCy/Tac/MMF (11 AML and 12 MDS) with a matched unrelated donor. Median age at HCT was 70 years (range, 55-76) with median HCT-CI of 4 (range, 1-10). 16 (70%) received prior Ven for initial MDS/AML therapy. 20 (87%) had <5% blasts at screening; 9 (39%) in CR. Diagnostic TP53 mutations were present in 14 (61%), with 13/14 (93%) multihit TP53 allelic status. Neutrophil engraftment for those who nadired (18/23, 78%) occurred at median 17 days (range, 5-26); platelet engraftment for those who nadired (20/23, 87%) occurred at median 20.5 days (range, 10-42). Median granulocyte and T-cell donor chimerism at day +28 was 100% (range, 99-100) and 80% (range, 37-100%), and at day +100 was 100% (range, 88-100) and 92.5% (range, 65-100), respectively. 17/23 (74%) started maintenance, 4 relapsed at a median of 58.5 days from HCT (all TP53-mutated), and 2 withdrew. Maintenance was initiated at a median 69 days (range, 47-90) after HCT (vs 57 days after HCT in the MTX-cohort). Patients have received a median of 3 of 8 cycles, with 6 patients still-ongoing. Maintenance was prematurely discontinued in 11 patients due to relapse (n=6), GVHD (n=3), and other (n=2). Ven was dose reduced in 9% for adverse events (AE) or tolerability. From day -8 until day +100, all patients experienced at least 1 grade 3-4 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE), including 100% with a grade 3-4 hematologic TEAE and 5/23 (22%) with ≥1 non-hematologic grade 3-4 TEAE. Non-hematologic grade 3-4 TEAEs were mucositis (n=2) and ALT increase, hyperbilirubinemia, anorexia, diarrhea, esophagitis, nausea, and renal colic, each in 1 patient. There were no graft failures. Grade 1 CRS occurred in 2 patients. There was 1 DLT: a grade 4 subdural hematoma on day +14 surgically managed. Infection of any grade during this period occurred in 9 (39%) patients, including 6 patients (26%) with grade 3-4 infection (all bacteremia). This compares to 9/27 (33%) infection (any grade) and 3/27 (11%) grade 3-4 infection in the MTX-cohort. Median follow-up in the PTCy cohort is 349 days (range, 111-562). There have been 11 relapses (7/11 were TP53 mutated), with median time from HCT to relapse of 97 days (range, 55-373). Among the 7 deaths to date, 6 were due to primary disease. Comparing early outcomes (PTCy-cohort vs MTX-cohort): 100-day non-relapse mortality was 0% vs 0% and 6-month cumulative incidence of acute GVHD grade 2-4 was 4.6% vs 18.5%, respectively. To date, the PTCy-cohort has had 1 mild and 1 moderate chronic GVHD events. Clinical outcomes with mature follow-up and NGS-MRD will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Ven+FluBu2 HCT with PTCy/Tac/MMF followed by Ven/Aza maintenance was safe but associated with delayed maintenance start and a higher proportion of severe infections as compared to our prior MTX-based GVHD prophylaxis cohort. Incidence of acute GVHD was low.
Article Details
Authors (18)
H. Moses Murdock
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Kyle Hebert
Jennifer Brock
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Elise Auriemma
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Felicia Lim
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Jeremy Ryan
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Mahasweta Gooptu
1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Roman Shapiro
1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Corey Cutler
1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Amar Kelkar
1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Vincent Ho
1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Denbaa Bat-Erdene
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Anthony Letai
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology, Boston, United States
Jerome Ritz
Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
R. Coleman Lindsley
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Joseph Antin
1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Robert Soiffer
1Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Jacqueline Garcia
1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology, Boston, United States