Vapor–liquid equilibrium of water with the machine-learned ML-BOP model
Abstract
Over the past few decades, many classical force-fields have been developed to model water. However, capturing the properties of water across its solid, liquid, and vapor phases remains a challenge. The coarse-grained machine-learned bond order potential (ML-BOP) model accurately reproduces the structural and thermodynamic properties of liquid water in both stable and supercooled states, as well as the thermodynamics of ice-water equilibrium and polyamorphism, comparable to all-atom models TIP4P/2005 and TIP4P/Ice, but with nearly 100 times lower computational cost. In this study, we evaluate the ability of ML-BOP to describe vapor–liquid coexistence properties of water, despite its development excluding any such training data. We find that ML-BOP underestimates the surface tension at ambient conditions and its slope of temperature dependence, a trend common among coarse-grained models lacking explicit hydrogen atoms. Nevertheless, ML-BOP accurately reproduces vapor–liquid coexistence densities and predicts the critical point (Tc = 653.27 ± 3.0 K and ρc = 0.328 ± 0.004 g cm−3) in excellent agreement with experiment and comparable to TIP4P/2005. ML-BOP outperforms the widely used mW model in reproducing vapor–liquid coexistence properties of water. ML-BOP also captures the high-temperature inflection in the surface tension curve and the specific surface entropy anomaly, predicting the temperature of maximum surface entropy closer to experiment than TIP4P/2005. Furthermore, we investigate the Guldberg and Eötvös empirical relationships in ML-BOP, demonstrating quantitative predictions of boiling-critical temperature scaling and enthalpy of vaporization. Overall, ML-BOP offers a promising balance of accuracy and efficiency, making it the most capable coarse-grained water model currently available for simulating water across various regimes.
Article Details
Journal Info
The Journal of Chemical Physics
American Institute of Physics
Authors (2)
Pintu Kumar
Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati , Guwahati, Assam 781039,
Debdas Dhabal
Department of Chemistry, The University of Utah