Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization is associated with worse outcomes post allogenic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation
Abstract
Abstract Background Intestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is associated with gut microbiome dysbiosis. Furthermore, VRE colonization may help sustain ongoing dysbiosis potentially contributing to persistent microbiota imbalance. Rectal swabs PCR are widely validated as a practical and cost effective method for detecting VRE colonization compared to the gene sequencing needed for microbiota diversity analysis. VRE colonization has been linked to poor outcomes following allo-HSCT but not previously demonstrated in a large patient dataset. Methods We reviewed the charts of 759 patients who received an allo-HSCT at the University of Kansas Medical Center between January 2008 and December 2016. A patient was considered VRE-colonized if a rectal swab was positive for VRE either before allo-HSCT or within 30 days after the allo-HSCT. We compared early and late transplant outcomes based on VRE colonization status. We conducted a univariable analysis using Mann-Whitney, chi-square. The Kaplan-Meier and multivariable regression analyses were also performed. Data analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism and statistical significance was considered at p <0.05. Results There were 331 (43.6%) VRE colonized out of total 759 patients included in this study. Patient demographics and transplant-related characteristics were similar between the VRE-colonized and non-colonized groups. The median age was similar (53 vs. 54 years), and male gender was predominant in both groups (59 Vs 61%) for VRE colonized and non-colonized groups respectively. The most common diagnosis was MDS/AML, which accounted for 61.7% of patients in the VRE-colonized group and 55.2% in the non-colonized group. Most patients received peripheral stem cell grafts, with slightly more PSC use among non-colonized patients (80% vs. 73%). Matched unrelated and matched sibling donors were 61.33% and 30.5% in the VRE colonized group vs. 54.6% and 37.6% in the VRE non colonized group. 59% of patients in both groups received reduced-intensity conditioning. GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus/MTX was 60% in VRE colonized and 63% in non VRE colonized. Post transplant cyclophosphamide use was limited to haploidentical donors, who numbered 8% in both groups. The median HCT-CI score was 2 in both groups; expected CIBMTR 1-year survival scores were also the same (68%). There was no difference in the median time to absolute neutrophil count engraftment (16 days) between both groups. However, the platelet recovery was 2 days longer in the VRE-colonized group (19 vs. 17 days, p<0.01). VRE-colonized patients required significantly more transfusion units than non-colonized patients, median packed RBCs units (3 vs 2; p<0.001) and median platelets units (4 vs 2; p<0.001). Patients with VRE colonization had a significantly higher rate of culture-proven bacteremia in the first 30 days post-transplant (22.36% vs 13.08%; p=0.0008). The median hospital stay was significantly longer for VRE-colonized patients than non-colonized patients (26 days vs. 25 days, p<0.001). Patients with VRE colonization had a significantly higher incidence of grade 2 or higher acute GVHD compared to non-colonized patients (60.73% vs. 49.53%; p=0.0026). They also experienced a higher rate of grade 3 or higher acute GVHD (28% vs. 17.9%; p=0.01). At day 100 post-transplant, VRE-colonized patients demonstrated significantly lower lymphocyte counts than non-colonized controls for both CD4+ T cells (174 vs 204/μL; p = 0.035) and CD19+ B cells (20 vs 32/μL; p = 0.036). There was no significant difference observed in 100-day survival between the VRE-colonized (86.6%) and non-colonized (89.1%) groups (p = 0.29). However, 1-year survival rates were significantly lower in the VRE-colonized group (58.4%) compared to the non-colonized group 68.1% (p = 0.0059). This difference was reflected in the median overall survival, which was 518 days in the VRE-colonized group compared to 1370 days in the non-colonized group (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the VRE-colonized group showed an increased cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality. Conclusion While gut microbiota sequencing is limited by cost and turnaround time. VRE colonization is a cost effective and is associated with worse outcomes following allo-HSCT including overall survival.
Article Details
Authors (10)
Haitham Abdelhakim
1The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States
Abdalla Shoaib
1University of Kansas Medical Center, Division of Hematological Malignancy and Cellular Therapeutics, kansas, United States
Marwa Elsayed
2Indiana University, Division of Hematological Malignancy and Cellular Therapeutics, Bloomington, United States
Nadia Ghallab
3University of Vermont, Internal Medicine, Burlington, United States
Leyla Shune
Anurag Singh
Shaun DeJarnette
1University of Kansas Medical Center, Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Westwood, United States
Anthony Sung
16Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
Joseph McGuirk
2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States
Sunil Abhyankar
2University of Kansas Medical Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Kansas City, United States