Utilisation of machine learning algorithms to predict relapse risk following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for patients with myeloid malignancies
Abstract
Abstract Background: Disease relapse remains the primary cause of treatment failure following alloSCT for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplasia/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN). Early mixed donor chimerism is frequently associated with relapse risk at a population level, yet its predictive accuracy is modest when considered in an individual patient. We hypothesised that a more nuanced analysis of peripheral blood CD3+/CD3- chimerism dynamics in combination with key recipient, donor and transplant-related variables could improve relapse prediction, providing a valuable tool to guide post-alloSCT surveillance and pre-emptive intervention decision making. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study using data from 259 adult patients who underwent first alloSCT for AML or MDS/MPN between 2016 and 2023 at the Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia. A total of 45 clinical, demographic and transplant-related variables were extracted, including CD3+/CD3- chimerism at days 30, 60, and 100 post-alloSCT. Chimerism analysis was performed by short tandem repeat testing by polymerase chain reaction followed by fragment analysis, with a sensitivity of 1-5%. Derived features such as the rate and direction of donor chimerism change between timepoints (e.g., day 60 to 100 post-alloSCT) were empirically determined. We developed and compared multiple machine learning models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, gradient-boosted trees, k-Nearest Neighbours and Naive Bayes classifiers. To address the class imbalance between relapsed and non-relapsed patients, we employed Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique and adjusted class weights. Feature selection was performed using recursive feature elimination and univariate analysis. Hence, a total of 100 different feature extraction and machine learning model combinations were tested. Performance was evaluated via cross-validation using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1-score, sensitivity, specificity and calibration curves. Results: Patients consisted predominantly of males (60%) with AML (70%) at a median age of 59 (range: 17-73). Reduced intensity conditioning was used in 63% of patients and matched unrelated donors were the primary donor source (52%). Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was predominantly calcineurin inhibitor-based (85%) with anti-thymocyte globulin used in 52%. Morphological relapse was encountered in 76 patients (29%) at a median of 224 days (interquartile range: 466). The most predictive features included CD3+ donor chimerism at day 60 and 100 post-alloSCT, changes in chimerism between these timepoints, recipient age, conditioning intensity and disease subtype. A Random Forest classifier was the best performing model — achieving an AUC of 0.83, sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.80 and an F1-score of 0.74. Calibration analysis demonstrated that predicted relapse probabilities were well-aligned with relapse events, suggesting that the model provides accurate risk estimates for disease relapse. Conclusion: Using a unique machine learning algorithm, we have identified that changes in CD3+ donor chimerism, when analysed alongside key established transplant variables, enables highly accurate prediction of post-alloSCT relapse and may guide clinicians with making timely individualised interventions to prevent relapse.
Article Details
Authors (6)
Ray Mun Koo
1Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Translational Research Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia
Farhad Goodarzy
4Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
Eric Wong
Haematology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Tony Papenfuss
4Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia
Rachel Koldej
1The Royal Melbourne Hospital, ACRF Translational Research Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia
David Ritchie
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melboure Hospital, Melbourne, Australia