Use of KMT2 family mutations to define a distinct epithelial-high, stromal-depleted, and interferon-active gene expression state in colorectal cancer.
Abstract
3671 Background: The KMT2A–D (MLL1–4) family of H3K4 methyltransferases are critical epigenetic regulators of enhancer landscapes and cell identity. At least one of the genes is mutated in 20-25% of colorectal cancer. Their role in shaping the tumor microenvironment (TME) remains distinct from their established roles in leukemia, where they are better described. We tested whether KMT2 mutations are associated with specific immune/stromal phenotypes that could inform therapeutic stratification. Methods: We analyzed a retrospective institutional CRC cohort using targeted NGS (n = 2,267; 565 KMT2 -mutant [MUT], 1,702 wild-type [WT]) and a transcriptomic subset with matched RNA-seq (n = 353; 73 MUT, 280 WT) from primary and metastatic specimens. Differential expression (DESeq2) and pathway enrichment (Hallmark GSEA) compared MUT vs. WT, adjusting for batch and tissue site. VST-based module z-scores (cancer associated fibroblast [CAF]/stroma, epithelial, IFN response, cell-cycle) were computed. xCell, EPIC, CIBERSORTx, and ESTIMATE scores were analyzed by linear regression on z-scored outcomes (MUT vs WT) adjusted for batch and tissue site; Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR). β denotes the adjusted mean difference in standardized score (MUT–WT) in SD units. Overall survival was assessed by Cox proportional hazards models. Results: KMT2 -MUT tumors demonstrate a unique tumor biology, with higher epithelial (β = 0.30, FDR = 0.011), IFN response (β = 0.24, FDR = 0.021), and cell-cycle (β = 0.24, FDR = 0.021) modules with lower CAF/stroma (β = −0.29, FDR = 0.011). Consistent with this, GSEA showed enrichment of IFN-α/γ and proliferation programs (MYC/E2F/G2M) and depletion of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), myogenesis, and apical junction pathways (FDR < 0.05). TME composition tools demonstrated lower stromal content [lower CAFs (EPIC, β = −0.288, FDR = 0.102), lower fibroblasts/stroma scores (xCell, β≈−0.36/−0.35, FDR = 0.079), and trend toward lower StromalScore (ESTIMATE, β = −0.24, FDR = 0.20)], and trends to higher Th2 (xCell, β = 0.40, FDR = 0.059) and NK cells (xCell, β = 0.38, FDR = 0.079). After adjusting for age, sex, ECOG performance status, primary tumor site, stage, RAS and BRAF mutation status, and MSI status, overall survival did not differ significantly between tumors with and without KMT2 family mutations, although there was a trend toward improved outcomes (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70–1.00; p = 0.078). Conclusions: KMT2 family mutations in CRC characterize a tumor subset with retained epithelial identity, active proliferation, and interferon signaling, but markedly reduced stromal infiltration and EMT programs. This distinct biology suggests KMT2 loss may impede the acquisition of aggressive mesenchymal features, highlighting a potential biomarker for stromal-modulating or immune-based therapies.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Songwit Payapwattanawong
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Jessica Lal
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Yixin Xu
Kangyu Lin
State Key Laboratory of Radio Frequency Heterogeneous Integration Shenzhen University Shenzhen China
Emerik Osterlund
Cynthia Yeung
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Berta Martin
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Kathryn Aziz
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Kristin Alfaro
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Giulia Maddalena
Medical Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCSS, Padua, Italy
Guglielmo Vetere
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Arvind Dasari
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Christine Parseghian
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Jason Willis
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
John Paul Y.C. Shen
Department of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Michael J. Overman
Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Van K. Morris
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Kunal Rai
Scott Kopetz
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston