Use of circulating tumour DNA to prospectively guide a switch from targeted to immune therapy in BRAF mutant advanced melanoma: the randomised phase II CAcTUS trial

R Rebecca J. Lee D Dominic G. Rothwell N Nigel Smith S Shien Chow J Juan Delgado-SanMartin H Hitesh Mistry Y Yvonne Sylvestre S Shih-Chieh Chiang H Harry Clarke G Gabriela Gremel A Avinash Gupta K Kimberley Hockenhull N Noel Kelso R Rohit Kochhar D Damian Mullan R Ruth Plummer P Patricio Serra H Heather Shaw H Holly Summersgill S Samra Turajlic F Florent Mouliere R Richard Marais C Caroline Dive P Paul Lorigan

Abstract

Abstract Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (CPI) for BRAF mutant advanced melanoma first-line results in a better long-term survival compared to targeted therapy (TT), however TT induction may benefit poor prognosis groups. The parallel-arm, randomised phase II, multicentre, feasibility CAcTUS trial (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03808441) randomised 21 patients to receive standard of care investigators choice TT or CPI, switching to the alternative upon progression ( n  = 10), or commencing TT and switching to CPI upon an ≥80% reduction of BRAF variant allele frequency ( VAF) in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA; n = 11). The study achieved its primary endpoints with 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94-100%) of critical results provided within 7 days to inform a decision to switch and 100% of patients commencing TT achieving an ≥80% reduction of BRAF VAF (95% CI: 80-100%). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and overall survival. No new safety signals were observed for TT/CPI. Post-hoc analysis of clinical features, circulating cytokines and chemokines at ctDNA nadir following TT induction suggested a more favourable profile prior to CPI initiation. Longitudinal ctDNA dynamics revealed ctDNA provided an early signal of CPI benefit and that rechallenge with TT following CPI progression resulted in a further ctDNA response. These data support the utility of ctDNA to guide treatment decision-making within a clinically relevant timeframe to optimise treatment scheduling strategies.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 17, Issue 1
Published May 21, 2026
ISSN 2041-1723
Publisher Nature Portfolio

Journal Info

Nature Communications

Nature Portfolio

ISSN: 2041-1723 Open Access Life Sciences

Authors (24)

R

Rebecca J. Lee

D

Dominic G. Rothwell

N

Nigel Smith

S

Shien Chow

J

Juan Delgado-SanMartin

H

Hitesh Mistry

Y

Yvonne Sylvestre

S

Shih-Chieh Chiang

H

Harry Clarke

G

Gabriela Gremel

A

Avinash Gupta

K

Kimberley Hockenhull

N

Noel Kelso

R

Rohit Kochhar

D

Damian Mullan

R

Ruth Plummer

P

Patricio Serra

H

Heather Shaw

H

Holly Summersgill

S

Samra Turajlic

F

Florent Mouliere

R

Richard Marais

C

Caroline Dive

P

Paul Lorigan