Updated survival outcomes of pomalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with renal impairment: A prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Renal impairment (RI) affects 20-40% of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients and independently predicts adverse survival. Bortezomib-based triplet regimens (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide or thalidomide with dexamethasone) have been recommended for multiple myeloma (MM) with RI by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). However, these confer only limited survival benefits in such patients, with a reported 2-year overall survival (OS) of ~58%. Novel regimens that simultaneously target myeloma and reverse RI are critically needed. We previously reported at the ASH 2022 Annual Meeting and in Blood Advances (2023;7:7581-84) that PVD triplet therapy (pomalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone) in NDMM-RI achieved a 75.4% renal response rate at 3 months (best response 78.7%), without compromising stem cell harvest. Here, we present extended follow-up survival outcomes for this cohort. METHODS In this prospective, open-label, phase 2 trial (ChiCTR2100043748), 61 NDMM-RI patients (eGFR <40 mL/min) were enrolled at 28 Chinese centers (February 2021–January 2022). Key inclusion criteria included cast nephropathy, measurable disease, and no prior anti-myeloma therapy. Patients received up to 9 cycles of PVD induction (pomalidomide 4mg d1-14/21, bortezomib 1.3mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in the first two 21-day cycles and weekly in the following 35-day cycles, dexamethasone 20mg twice per bortezomib dosage) ± autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The primary endpoint was 3-month renal response (IMWG criteria). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Of the 61 intention-to-treat patients, 33 (54.1%) completed the planned therapy (13 underwent ASCT, 20 received ≥6 PVD cycles). After a median follow-up of 42 months, 19 patients had disease progression and 17 had died. Causes of deaths were disease progression (n=8), non-MM comorbidities (n=5), and unknown causes (n=4). No new long-term safety signals emerged during the follow-up period. Among the entire PVD cohort (n=61), 57 patients had evaluable PFS data and 60 had evaluable OS data. Median PFS and OS were not reached after 42-month follow-up. The estimated 3-year PFS rate was 74.4% (95% CI: 61.9%-86.9%) and the estimated 3-year OS rate was 80.2% (95% CI: 69.6%-90.8%). Notably, patients achieving renal response had significantly superior OS compared to non-responders (HR 0.327, 95% CI: 0.120-0.893; P=0.029), highlighting renal recovery as a key prognostic factor of survival. CONCLUSION With extended follow-up, this study demonstrates that PVD induction offers survival benefit for NDMM patients with RI in addition to high renal response rates. Achieving renal recovery was strongly associated with improved OS.
Article Details
Authors (34)
Yuan Jian
1Department of Hematology, Myeloma Research Center of Beijing, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Long Chang
Department of Microelectronics, Jiangsu University 1 , Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212013,
Shi Minxia
3Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Hematology Research Center of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China
Ying Sun
Xiao-Xia Chu
5Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
Hua Xue
Wenrong Huang
Xuliang Shen
16Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China
Jie Ma
Guo-Rong Jia
10Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Secience and Technology, Baotou, China
Ya-Qing Feng
11Department of Hematology, The Third People's Hospital Of Datong, Datong, China
Zhen-Fang Xi
12Department of Hematology, Linfen People's Hospital, Linfen, China
Yan-Hong Zhao
13Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
Yanping Ma
Jing Xiao
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University
Guang-Yu Ma
19The Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
Qing-Ming Wang
17Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
Li Bao
Department of Ophthalmology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Yujun Dong
He-Bing Zhou
Chunyan Sun
School of Mathematics and Physics, Anqing Normal University 1 , Anqing 246133,
Guo-Hong Su
22The Second Department of Hematology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China
Yan Yan
Sai-Yin Qimuge
24Department of Hematology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos, China
Liping Su
2Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China
Jingnan Sun
21The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
Weiwei Tian
17The Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
Xiu Li Sun
39Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
Hongmei Jing
Da Gao
State Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, School of Environment, Tsinghua University
Hong-Hu Zhu
Wenming Chen
Department of Hematology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing
Jian Li
Wen Gao