Updated results from the phase 2 LITESPARK-003 study of belzutifan plus cabozantinib in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

T Toni K. Choueiri (Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA) T Todd Michael Bauer (Sarah Cannon Cancer Center and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN) J Jaime R. Merchan (Department of Medical Oncology, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL) D David F. McDermott (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA) R Robert A. Figlin (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) E Edward Arrowsmith (Tennessee Oncology, Chattanooga, TN) M M. Dror Michaelson (Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) E Elisabeth I. Heath (Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) A Anishka D’Souza (Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center) S Song Zhao (Dalian University of Technology , , ,) L Laurent Kassalow (Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ) R Rodolfo F. Perini (Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ) D Donna Vickery (Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ) S Scott S. Tykodi (University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA)

Abstract

549 Background: In the phase 2 LITESPARK-003 study (NCT03634540), belzutifan plus cabozantinib showed antitumor activity in patients with advanced ccRCC who were treatment-naive (cohort 1) or previously treated (cohort 2). We present updated results from cohorts 1 and 2 with a median follow-up of 34.4 months and 49.9 months, respectively. Methods: Eligible patients had advanced or metastatic ccRCC and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Cohort 1 included patients with no prior systemic therapy. Cohort 2 included patients who had received prior immunotherapy and ≤2 systemic regimens. Starting doses for patients in both cohorts were belzutifan 120 mg PO QD + cabozantinib 60 mg PO QD. The primary end point was ORR per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment. Secondary end points included DOR, PFS, OS, and safety. Results: 50 patients were enrolled and treated in cohort 1 and 52 patients in cohort 2. Confirmed ORR was 70% (95% CI, 55-82; 6 CRs, 29 PRs) in cohort 1 and 31% (95% CI, 19-45; 2 CRs, 14 PRs) in cohort 2. In cohort 2, ORR was 32% (95% CI, 16-52; 1 CR, 8 PRs) in patients who received prior immunotherapy only (n = 28) and 29% (95% CI, 13-51; 1 CR, 6 PRs) in patients who received both prior immunotherapy and anti-VEGFR TKIs (n = 24). ORR by IMDC risk and baseline tumor burden subgroups is shown in the Table. Median DOR was 29.1 months (range, 1.9+ to 47.4; + indicates ongoing response at the last assessment) in cohort 1 and 30.4 months (range, 4.2+ to 45.6) in cohort 2. An estimated 62% of responders in cohort 1 and 52% in cohort 2 remained in response for ≥24 months. Median PFS was 30.3 months (95% CI, 19.4-not reached) in cohort 1 and 13.8 mo (95% CI, 9.2-19.4) in cohort 2. Median OS has not been reached in cohort 1 and was 26.7 months (95% CI, 20.0-41.1) in cohort 2. Overall, 27 (54%) patients in cohort 1 and 34 (65%) patients in cohort 2 had a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). No patients died due to a TRAE in cohort 1 and 1 patient (2%) died due to treatment-related respiratory failure in cohort 2. Conclusions: With updated follow-up,belzutifan plus cabozantinib showed durable antitumor activity in both frontline and subsequent-line treatment of patients with RCC and a safety profile consistent with prior reports. These results support further investigation of a HIF-2α inhibitor in combination with a VEGFR-TKI as a treatment option for advanced ccRCC in both settings. Clinical trial information: NCT03634540 . Cohort 1 Cohort 2 IMDC risk category Favorable n = 33ORR, 73% (95% CI, 54-87); 5 CRs, 19 PRs n = 9ORR, 67% (95% CI, 30-93); 1 CR, 5 PRs Intermediate or poor n = 17ORR, 65% (95% CI, 38-86); 1 CR, 10 PRs n = 43ORR, 23% (95% CI, 12-39); 1 CR, 9 PRs Baseline tumor burden a Low (< median) n = 25ORR, 80% (95% CI, 59-93);3 CRs, 17 PRs n = 26ORR, 27% (95% CI, 12-48); 2 CRs, 5 PRs High (≥ median) n = 25ORR, 60% (95% CI, 39-79); 3 CRs, 12 PRs n = 26ORR, 35% (95% CI, 17-56); 0 CRs, 9 PRs a Based on the sum of diameter of the target lesions at baseline.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 549-549
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

T

Toni K. Choueiri

Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

T

Todd Michael Bauer

Sarah Cannon Cancer Center and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN

J

Jaime R. Merchan

Department of Medical Oncology, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL

D

David F. McDermott

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

R

Robert A. Figlin

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

E

Edward Arrowsmith

Tennessee Oncology, Chattanooga, TN

M

M. Dror Michaelson

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

E

Elisabeth I. Heath

Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

A

Anishka D’Souza

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

S

Song Zhao

Dalian University of Technology , , ,

L

Laurent Kassalow

Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

R

Rodolfo F. Perini

Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

D

Donna Vickery

Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ

S

Scott S. Tykodi

University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA