Updated results from a phase II study of perioperative disitamab vedotin (RC48-ADC) plus cadonilimab (AK104) for HER2-expressing muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Abstract
4588 Background: Several current ongoing clinical trials have shown promising efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) alone and in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with MIBC (ASCO 2024). Disitamab vedotin (RC48-ADC) is a novel humanized anti-HER2 ADC. RC48-ADC combined with cadonilimab (AK104), known as the PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody ICI, may have enhanced synergistic anti-tumor effects attributed to the mechanism of action and achieve more clinical benefit. Here, we report updated results from a phase II study of perioperative RC48-ADC plus AK104 in HER2-expressing MIBC (NCT06074484). Methods: This single-arm, open-label, multicentre study evaluates the efficacy and safety of RC48-ADC plus AK104 as a novel neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with treatment-naïve HER2-expressing (immunohistochemistry, IHC 1+, 2+, 3+) MIBC (T2-T4a, N0-1, M0; ECOG PS score 0-1). Eligible pts received neoadjuvant RC48-ADC (2.0 mg/kg D1 Q2W, 4 cycles) + AK104 (6.0 mg/kg D1 Q2W, 4 cycles) followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (RC+PLND), and postoperative adjuvant RC48-ADC (2.0 mg/kg D1 Q3W, 6 cycles) + AK104 (10.0 mg/kg D1 Q3W, 14 cycles). The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, pT0N0M0). Secondary endpoints were pathologic downstaging rate (pDS, yp≤T1N0), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Results: By January 2025, 43 pts had been successfully enrolled. Of these, 81.4% (35/43) were male and 18.6% (8/43) were female, with a median age of 65 years (range, 44-78). HER2 expression was positive (IHC 2+ or 3+) in 72.1% of pts and PD-L1 positive (CPS ≥ 10) in 34.9%. The pCR rate was 64.71% (22/34, 95% CI, 47.85-78.58) in all evaluable pts, 81.82% (9/11) in HER2 1+ and 56.57% (13/23) in HER2 2+/3+ pts, meanwhile 77.78% (14/18) in cT2, 30.00% (3/10) in cT3, and 83.33% (5/6) in cT4a/N1 pts. The overall pDS rate was 76.47% (26/34). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade occurred in 90.7% of pts (39/43), with ≥ Grade 3 TRAEs in 18.6% (8/43), including fever, rash, bone marrow hypocellular, alanine aminotransferase increased, and immune-mediated myocarditis or pneumonitis. No Grade 4 or Grade 5 TRAEs occurred. At a median follow-up of 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.0-12.1), 2 pts had died, but the median DFS and OS were not reached which remained stable on study and would be updated. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant RC48-ADC plus AK104 demonstrated favorable efficacy and a manageable safety profile, supporting its potential as a valuable treatment modality for HER2-expressing MIBC. Long-term benefits and further understanding the role of this combination therapy in the perioperative setting of MIBC will be critical to advance treatment strategies. Clinical trial information: NCT06074484 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Sujun Han
Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Feiya Yang
Yong Zhang
Xiongjun Ye
Hongzhe Shi
Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Bolin Jia
Department of Urology, National Cancer Center & National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Xingang Bi
Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Wasilijiang Wahafu
Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
Hongsong Bai
Cancer Hospital of HuanXing ChaoYang District Beijing, Beijing, China
Linjun Hu
Department of Urology, Cancer Hospital of HuanXing Chaoyang District Beijing, Beijing, People’s Republic of China, Beijing, China
Xin Wang
Nianzeng Xing