Updated results from a Phase II study of minimal residual disease-guided venetoclax + obinutuzumab for the initial treatment of fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Abstract
Abstract Background: Undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) at the end of first-line (1L) treatment (tx) with 12-cycles (C) of venetoclax (ven) + obinutuzumab (obin) is associated with prolonged survival for patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL, Al Sawaf et al. Blood 2024). We hypothesized that MRD may be used to guide ven tx duration for CLL pts treated with 1L ven + obin. Methods In this ongoing phase II, multicenter investigator-initiated study, pts receive ven + obin for 1L tx of CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (NCT04447768). Eligible pts have a CIRS score of ≤ 6 and require 1L tx per iwCLL 2018 criteria. Pts receive 6 x 28-day C of obin and initiate ven on C1D22. Ven duration is dependent on peripheral blood (PB) MRD status measured by ClonoSeq next generation sequencing. At C7, pts undergo MRD testing. Pts uMRD6 (<10-6 sensitivity) at both C7 and C9 dc ven after 9C and enter treatment free observation (TFO). Pts with detectable MRD6 (dMRD6) at C7 undergo repeat testing at C12; if uMRD5 (<10-5) pts dc ven after 12C. Pts dMRD5 at C12 continue ven for an additional 12C (24C total) prior to TFO. The primary study endpoint is 36-month PFS; the unpromising rate is set at 82% and will be tested by a nonparametric survival estimate (Kaplan-Meier) along with Greenwood's formula. RNA sequencing (RNAseq) was performed pre-tx on patient bone marrow (or PB if inaspirable) samples. Unsupervised clustering using machine learning (ML) based on consensus nonnegative matrix factorization was applied to the most variable genes to identify patient clusters. Clusters were then biologically characterized by gene signature scoring using xCell algorithm and assessed for association with uMRD6 at C7 using a Fisher exact test. Results Baseline characteristics of the 100 pts who initiated tx include: median age 58 (range 34-81); 71% male, 90% White, 3% Black and 2% Asian, 5% unknown; 49% IGHV unmutated, 16% TP53 mutation, 8% del17p (previously reported, Roeker et al. ASH 2024). 3 pts stopped tx prior to C7. 51 pts were uMRD6 at C7 and C9 and completed 9C ven. 46 pts were dMRD6 at C7; 6 pts stopped tx outside of meeting protocol requirements and are included in intention-to-treat (IIT) analyses. 32 pts were uMRD5 at C12 and dc ven after 12C. 8 pts were dMRD5 at C12: 5 continued ven per protocol (3 completed 24C ven, 2 ongoing tx as of 15 May 2025 data cut-off), 2 stopped ven outside of protocol requirements (included in ITT analyses), and 1 pt withdrew consent. At a median follow-up of 35 months, the 36-month PFS rate is 90% (95% CI: 84%, 97%). 36-month OS is 94% (95% CI: 89%, 99%). Landmark PFS analyses from EOT were performed for pts who dc ven after 9C due to uMRD6 (24-month PFS 92%, 95% CI: 85, 100%, n=51) and pts who dc ven after 12C due to uMRD5 (24-month PFS 96%, 95% CI: 89%, 100%, n=32). For pts dc ven after 9C due to uMRD6 (n=51), PB MRD at 12C after EOT was: 59% uMRD6, 12% uMRD5, 4% uMRD4, 8% dMRD4 and 18% unknown. For pts dc ven after 12C due to uMRD5 status (n=32), PB MRD at 12C following EOT was: 9% uMRD6, 31% uMRD5, 9% uMRD4, 25% dMRD4 and 25% unknown. Of the 5 pts with PD, 3 pts have had Richter Transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (all uMRD6 at C7 / 9). Two pts with PD have not met iwCLL tx criteria and remain in TFO. Five pts have died (suicide, West Nile encephalitis, COVID-19, complications of glioblastoma and RT DLBCL). Five C12 dMRD5 pts who continued ven have reached C18, with only 1 of 5 converting to uMRD5 in PB. However, all 5 maintained uMRD4 (<10-4). Of 3 pts that completed 24C ven (2 ongoing tx), 1 pt had deepening of response to uMRD5 at C24, and 2 pts had rising MRD on ven (dMRD4 at C24). To investigate patient heterogeneity at baseline and its relationship to uMRD, we clustered patient RNAseq samples into two clusters using artificial intelligence/ML based unsupervised clustering. The clusters associated with uMRD6 at C7 (Fisher exact test p=0.038), and patients in the cluster with significantly higher immunosuppressive cells such as T-regulatory cells and M2 macrophages were less likely to be uMRD6 at C7. Conclusions At a median follow-up of 35 months, the estimated 36-month PFS rate is 90%. RNAseq transcriptomic analyses identified that patients with enriched immunosuppressive cells were less likely to be uMRD6 at C7. Additional follow-up is required to confirm the durability of this MRD-guided ven + obin tx strategy.
Article Details
Authors (42)
Meghan Thompson
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Anthony Mato
2Cayuga Medical Center, Cayuga, United States
Andrew Zelenetz
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Jae Park
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, New York, United States
Mark Geyer
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Andriy Derkach
David Nemirovsky
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Deborah Stephens
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Hematology, Chapel Hill, United States
Catherine Coombs
2University of California Irvine, Irvine, United States
Prioty Islam
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Christopher Jensen
4University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States
Lorenzo Falchi
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Lia Palomba
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Anita Kumar
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Gilles Salles
41Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Eytan Stein
3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, New York, United States
Jennifer Lue
1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States
Lauren Nogan
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Bejal Kikani
4University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States
Ryan Sutterby
4University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States
Thu Quynh Nguyen
6Stanford University, Palo Alto, United States
Alexandra Allen
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Sumathy Sudhir
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Gail Panton
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Victoria Duffy
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Dianna Tyznar
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Jamila Brutus
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Tenzin Nyima
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Anmol Shah
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Dhara Soni
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Michael Silvestrone
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Monica Shah
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Miranda Harris
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Megha Karnam
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Claire Hutzler
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Kevin David
1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, Lymphoma Service, NEW YORK, United States
Aaron Goldberg
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Stephen Fleming
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Giovanni Diaz
7Genentech, San Francisco, United States
Habib Hamidi
Bita Fakhri
1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
Lindsey Roeker
5Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States