Updated long-term follow-up from a phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Abstract
811 Background: We previously reported our multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and split-dose cisplatin (GC) in 57 patients with high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (HG UTUC), where 63% of patients experienced a pathological response (<ypT2 N0) at radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Pathological response was associated with superior progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over a median 3-years of follow-up. Herein we report survival outcomes among the 50 patients treated at our institution with long-term follow-up. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed HG UTUC and/or radiographically visible tumor stage T2-T4a N0/NX disease with a positive upper tract urine cytology were eligible. All patients received 4 cycles of split-dose GC followed by RNU and lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoints for this report were PFS (defined as metastasis or death from UTUC), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and OS, stratified by pathological response to NAC. Responders (<ypT2 N0) included both complete responders (CR, ypT0 N0) and partial responders (PR, ypTa/Tis/T1 N0/X); non-responders (NR) included ≥ypT2 Nany. Follow up started at RNU and patients were censored at the last occurrence of: clinical assessment, imaging study, or blood draw. Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated survival outcomes and log-rank tests evaluated for significant differences. Results: Of the 50 patients available for analysis, 32 (64%) were responders, of which 10 (20%) were CR. Baseline characteristics were similar between responders and NR. Forty-four of 50 patients tolerated ≥3 cycles of GC. Over a median follow-up among survivors of 5.7 years (interquartile range: 5.0, 7.9), 16 progression events, 11 cancer-specific deaths, and 16 total deaths occurred. Overall event rates were 63% and 63% for PFS, 77% and 70% for CSS, and 75% and 54% for OS, at 7- and 9-years, respectively. Estimated survival was higher among responders, compared to NR for PFS (log-rank p<0.001), CSS (log-rank p=0.002), and OS (log-rank p=0.002); corresponding 7- and 9-year event rates are presented in the table. Survival and event estimates were similar between CR and PR. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate a durable long-term progression and survival advantage of split-dose GC as NAC for HG UTUC among patients with a pathological response. Clinical trial information: NCT01261728 . 7- and 9-year PFS, CSS, and OS rates in patients treated with NAC, stratified by pathological response at RNU. Outcome Characteristic* 7 Years (95% CI) 9 Years (95% CI) PFS Responders 80% (64%, 99%) 80% (64%, 99%) Non-responders 36% (19%, 69%) 36% (19%, 69%) CSS Responders 89% (76%, 100%) 79% (60%, 100%) Non-responders 54% (33%, 88%) 54% (33%, 88%) OS Responders 87% (73%, 100%) 67% (46%, 99%) Non-responders 54% (33%, 88%) 32% (14%, 77%) *Responders were defined as <ypT2 N0/NX; Non-responders were defined as ≥ypT2 Nany.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Viranda Jayalath
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Min Yuen Teo
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Melissa Assel
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Daniel Rodríguez
Abraham Meyerson
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Bernard H. Bochner
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Guido Dalbagni
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
S. Machele Donat
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Harry W. Herr
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Eugene K. Cha
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Timothy F. Donahue
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Eugene J. Pietzak
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
A. Ari Hakimi
Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
Kwanghee Kim
Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
Hebert Alberto Vargas
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Jonathan E. Rosenberg
Genitourinary Oncology Service Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA
Gopa Iyer
Dean F. Bajorin
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Jonathan Coleman
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY