Updated efficacy and safety results of JNJ-5322, a novel, next-generation BCMA×GPRC5D×CD3 trispecific antibody, in patients with Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: JNJ-5322 is a novel, next-generation trispecific antibody with capabilities to target dual myeloma antigens with a single molecule, and contains novel B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), G protein–coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), and CD3 binding domains. JNJ-5322's binding to both BCMA and GPRC5D results in improved binding avidity that may enhance efficacy by overcoming clonal heterogeneity and preventing antigen escape. The first-in-human study (NCT05652335) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) showed an improved or similar safety profile of JNJ-5322 compared with BCMA/GPRC5D bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) as monotherapy or in combination, and an overall response rate (ORR) of 100.0% at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in BCMA/GPRC5D naive patients. These data were supported by pharmacokinetic and exposure–response analyses that led to selection and dose optimization of the RP2D (100 mg every 4 weeks [Q4W]) and step-up dose (SUD; 5 mg). Here, we present updated safety and efficacy results of JNJ-5322 at the RP2D from part 1 of the ongoing phase 1 study. Methods: Dose escalation/expansion cohorts enrolled patients with RRMM who were triple-class exposed to a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. The primary objectives were to identify the RP2D and to assess safety at the RP2D. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were graded per CTCAE v5.0; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded per ASTCT guidelines. ORR was assessed by IMWG criteria. Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity was assessed at a threshold of 10–5 using next-generation sequencing. Results: As of July 9, 2025, 36 patients received JNJ-5322 at the RP2D with a median follow-up of 14.4 months. At baseline, 26.5% (9/34) had high-risk cytogenetics, 13.9% had ISS stage III disease, and 8.3% had extramedullary disease. Patients received a median of 4 (range 2–11) prior lines of therapy; 75.0% were BCMA/GPRC5D naive and 52.8% were triple-class refractory. The most common nonhematologic TEAEs were infections (80.6% [gr 3, 33.3%]) and skin-related (66.7%, all gr 1/2) and nail-related (61.1%, majority [58.3%] gr 1) TEAEs. The most common hematologic TEAEs were lymphopenia (47.2% [gr 3/4, 44.4%]) and neutropenia (44.4% [gr 3/4, 33.3%]). The cumulative incidence of gr ≥3 infections plateaued within the first year of therapy. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) use was recommended to maintain Ig levels ≥400 mg/dL; 91.7% of patients received IVIg. Hypogammaglobulinemia was reported in 52.8% of patients; among these, 94.7% received IVIg. CRS occurred in 52.8% (gr 1, 41.7%; gr 2, 11.1%). In cohorts without (received 100 mg Q4W) and with (received 100 mg Q4W/Q8W) prophylactic tocilizumab, CRS occurred in 69.2% (gr 2, 15.4%) and 20.0% (gr 2, 0%), respectively. No ICANS events were reported. Taste changes occurred in 58.3% (gr 1, 41.7%; gr 2, 16.7%); median duration was 57 days. Of 36 patients who received the RP2D, 27 were BCMA/GPRC5D naive with a median follow-up of 15.0 months; these patients showed a high ORR of 100.0% with deepening of response (complete response or better [≥CR], 77.8%) and a 12-month progression-free survival rate of 96.3%. Apart from 1 patient who died while in very good partial response (due to pneumonia in the setting of hypogammaglobulinemia <200 mg/dL), all 26 patients remain in response at 15.0 months of median follow-up, demonstrating durable responses. MRD negativity at 10–5 was achieved in 100.0% (10/10) of evaluable patients. Updated analyses with 6 additional months of follow-up will be presented at the conference. Conclusions: With longer follow-up in part 1 of the phase 1 trial, JNJ-5322 continues to demonstrate responses comparable to CAR-T therapy (ORR 100.0%) that are durable and continue to deepen (≥CR 77.8%), with a safety profile similar or improved compared with BsAbs targeting BCMA or GPRC5D. JNJ-5322 offers off-the-shelf, Q4W dosing and 1 SUD with low rates of gr 2 CRS that may enable an efficient approach to dual antigen targeting via convenient administration and outpatient treatment. These findings support further evaluation of JNJ-5322 in patients with RRMM.
Article Details
Authors (38)
Amrita Krishnan
9City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, United States
Martin Kaiser
Rakesh Popat
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London
Jeffrey Matous
9Colorado Blood Cancer Institute, Denver, United States
Alfred Garfall
1Division of Hematology-Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA., Philadelphia, United States
Gala Vega
1START Madrid-FJD, Hospital Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
Aurore Perrot
Sébastien Anguille
Albert Oriol
Institut Català d’Oncologia and Institut Josep Carreras, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
Nicolas Kint
Dienst Klinische Hematologie, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent, Belgium
Jo Caers
Saad Usmani
8Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Lionel Karlin
Service Hématologie, Hôpital Universitaire Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
Larysa Sanchez
1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
Cindy Varga
7Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, United States
Wilfried Roeloffzen
Department of Hematology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
Laura Rosiñol Dachs
4Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona., Barcelona, Spain
Darren Pan
1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
Paula Rodriguez-Otero
María-Victoria Mateos
Tadao Ishida
Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo
Kentaro Fukushima
University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
Pansy Minnick
1Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, United States
M. Damiette Smit
17Johnson & Johnson, Leiden, The Netherlands
Nikki Daskalakis
1Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, United States
Thomas Prior
1Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, United States
Deeksha Vishwamitra
Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, Pennsylvania, United States
Emily DeSantis
22Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, United States
Ashley Nguyen
1Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, United States
Brandi Hilder
From Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Y.C.C., I.A.), and the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University (Y.C.C., H.M., I.A.), Tel Aviv, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan (H.M.), and Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem (M.G.) — all in Israel; McGill University and McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (M.S.), and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton (M.P.C.) — all in Canada; Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (K.K.), Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Catholic University of Korea (C.-K.M.), and Seoul National University College of Medicine (S.-S.Y.) — all in Seoul, South Korea; Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander (E.M.O.), Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Center for Applied Medical Research, Pamplona (P.R.-O.), Institut Català d’Oncologia, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute, and the Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona (A.O.)...
Joseph Weidman
1Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, United States
Caroline Hodin
2Johnson & Johnson Beerse, Antwerp, Belgium
Daniel Jonathan
1Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, United States
Sangmin Lee
Cyrille Touzeau
Hans Lee
3Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, United States
Niels W.C.J. van de Donk
Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam
Monique Minnema
7University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands