Update results of benmelstobart (BEN) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) versus cCRT alone as neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A multicentre, randomised study.
Abstract
e16112 Background: Standard neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) for resectable ESCC yields only a 20-30% pathological complete response (pCR) rate. With immunotherapy has been approved for advanced ESCC, exploring its combination with cCRT in the neoadjuvant setting is imperative. Methods: This multicentre, randomised phase II trial planned to enroll 100 patients with resectable ESCC (T1-3N+M0/T3NanyM0). Patients were randomised 1:1 to benmelstobart (BEN) + cCRT or cCRT alone, stratified by cT stage (T1-2 vs T3). The BEN+cCRT group received BEN (1200mg, D1 and 22) plus cCRT (paclitaxel/carboplatin, 41.4 Gy/23 fraction of radiotherapy), while the cCRT group received cCRT alone. Surgery followed 6-8 weeks later. The primary endpoint was pCR rate in primary tumor site and lymph node. Secondary endpoints included MPR, ORR, DCR, R0 resection, 1-year DFS/OS rate, and safety. A preplanned radiation de-escalation to 36 Gy would be triggered if > 18 of the first 30 BEN+cCRT patients achieved pCR in first stage. Results: From Oct 24, 2024, to Nov 20, 2025, 82 patients were randomised to BEN+cCRT (n = 42) or cCRT alone (n = 40). Four patients in BEN+cCRT group withdrew after randomization without treatment. In the full analysis set (FAS), 38 and 40 patients were analyzed, respectively. 73.1% of patients were ECOG PS 1. 16.7% of patients had primary tumor in upper esophagus. Thirty-seven and 40 patients completed neoadjuvant therapy, respectively. The ORR was 55.3% vs 60.0% in each group. Surgery rates were 73.7% (28/38) vs 90.0% (36/40). Of them, the primary endpoint pCR rates were 50.0% (14/28) vs 36.1% (13/36); MPR rates were 89.3% (25/28) vs 61.1% (22/36), respectively. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 73.7% vs 60.0% of patients, with hematologic toxicity being the most common. No grade ≥3 radiation esophagitis or grade 5 TEAEs were observed. Conclusions: Despite not meeting the prespecified endpoint of the first stage and without a radiotherapy dose reduction, BEN plus cCRT shows potential efficacy as neoadjuvant therapy in resectable ESCC, with encouraging pCR rate, MPR rate and a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT06637163 . The pathological and surgical outcomes. Patients had surgery Patients had surgery FAS FAS BEN+cCRT (n=28) cCRT (n=36) BEN+cCRT (n=38) cCRT (n=40) pCR rate, n (%) 14 (50.0%) 13 (36.1%) 14 (36.8%) 13 (32.5%) pCR rate in primary tumor site, n (%) 17 (60.7%) 16 (44.4%) 17 (44.7%) 16 (40.0%) MPR rate, n (%) 25 (89.3%) 22 (61.1%) 25 (65.8%) 22 (55.0%) R0 resection, n (%) 28 (100%) 35 (97.2%) 28 (73.7%) 35 (87.5%) Tumor regression grade, n (%) 0 / 1 17 (60.7%) / 8 (28.6%) 16 (44.4%) / 5 (13.9%) 17 (44.7%) / 8 (21.1%) 16 (40.0%) / 5 (12.5%) 2 / 3 1 (3.6%) / 1 (3.6%) 8 (22.2%) / 6 (16.7%) 1 (2.6%) / 1 (2.6%) 8 (20.0%) / 6 (15.0%) Missing 1 (3.6%) 1(2.8%) 11 (28.9%) 5(12.5%)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (11)
Han Tang
Shenzhen Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Yang Zhang
Peng Tang
Institut für Chemie und Biochemie, Freie Universität Berlin
Yegang Ma
Shaobin Chen
Biao Li
Beijing Key Laboratory of Theory and Technology for Advanced Batteries Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering
Youhua Jiang
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
Dong Jiang
Shuoyan Liu
Shisuo Du
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Lijie Tan