Update of the EORTC QLQ-Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC-QLQ-OV28) phase I and II.

V Vesna Bjelic-Radisic (Department of Senology, Breast Center, Helios University Clinic Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany) A Andy Nordin (East Kent Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, United Kingdom) J Juan Ignacio Arraras (IDISNA Pamplona, Pamplona, Spain) I Ingvild Vistad (Department of Gynecology, Sørlandet Hospital Trust & Clinical Institute II, Medical Department, University of Bergen, Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway) A Ali Alkan A Anne Obergugggenberger (Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria) K Karin Kuljanic (University Hospital Centre Rijeka, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia) P Pernille Tina Jensen (Aarhus University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark) S Shira Peleg Hasson (Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Gray Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel) M Muna Alkhaifi E Eleonora Van Dorst (University Medical Center (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands) L Ligita Froding (Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark) J Jennifer Steinmetz (Helios University Hospital, Wuppertal, Germany) N Nora Nevries (Helios University Hospital, Wuppertal, Germany)

Abstract

5596 Background: Ovarian cancer is the eighth most common cancer in women worldwide. The 5-year survival rate is 90.0% for early-stage disease and 30.2% for advanced disease. The introduction of new treatment options, such as PARP inhibitors, immunotherapy and bevacizumab, has led to improved recurrence-free intervals and an increased number of long-term survivors. However, new therapies have also brought new side effects that are not sufficiently covered by the EORTC QLQ OV-28, which was developed in 1997. There is therefore a strong clinical and research need to update the questionnaire to reflect contemporary treatments and their impact on QoL. This work presents the results of Phases 1 and 2 of the EORTC module development study updating the EORTC QLQ-OV28. Methods: The EORTC QLQ-OV28 module was adapted in accordance with the EORTC QLG guidelines for methodology for updating modules focused on identifying QoL issues relevant to ovarian cancer patients. This involved a systematic literature search, a review of questionnaires , investigator brochures, focus groups, and research group meetings (Phase 1).An issue was added to the list if it had a patient and/or HCP relevance rating of at least 2 (on a scale of 1 to 4) and a priority rating of at least 30%. The relevant issues were then translated into items, resulting in a preliminary questionnaire (Phase 2). Results: The mixed methods approach identified 57 issues related to QoL in ovarian cancer patients. An issue list was created and used for interviews with 58 patients and 31 HCPs, who rated each issue according to its relevance using a four-point response format: 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', 'very much' and priority (yes/no). Of the initial 57 issues, 20 (as rated by patients) and 34 (as rated by HCPs) met both inclusion criteria. Sixteen of these were covered by the existing EORTC QLQ-OV28, and five new issues were identified: weight loss, numbness in the hands and feet, anxiety, concerns about acceptance of their condition, and impaired sexuality. Twelve issues from the existing questionnaire did not fulfil all the inclusion criteria.In Phase II, these issues were translated into items and used to create a preliminary 39-item questionnaire to assess QoL in ovarian cancer patients. Conclusions: The results of Phases I and II indicate that the current EORTC QLQ-OV28 module does not adequately address all the relevant QoL issues for patients with ovarian cancer. Five new issues are not addressed by the existing module, and twelve existing issues did not fulfil all the inclusion criteria. Therefore, the EORTC QLQ-OV28 module should be updated. A preliminary questionnaire will be tested in Phase III of the EORTC module development process. Note: This document represents preliminary findings of the module development and is subject to revision; subsequent modifications of the module in the next stages may reflect significant changes.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5596-5596
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

V

Vesna Bjelic-Radisic

Department of Senology, Breast Center, Helios University Clinic Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany

A

Andy Nordin

East Kent Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, United Kingdom

J

Juan Ignacio Arraras

IDISNA Pamplona, Pamplona, Spain

I

Ingvild Vistad

Department of Gynecology, Sørlandet Hospital Trust & Clinical Institute II, Medical Department, University of Bergen, Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway

A

Ali Alkan

A

Anne Obergugggenberger

Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

K

Karin Kuljanic

University Hospital Centre Rijeka, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia

P

Pernille Tina Jensen

Aarhus University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

S

Shira Peleg Hasson

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Gray Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

M

Muna Alkhaifi

E

Eleonora Van Dorst

University Medical Center (UMC), Utrecht, Netherlands

L

Ligita Froding

Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

J

Jennifer Steinmetz

Helios University Hospital, Wuppertal, Germany

N

Nora Nevries

Helios University Hospital, Wuppertal, Germany