Unmasking a rare complication: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) syndrome.

K Karan Jatwani (7George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington DC, United States) V Venkatesh Kolli (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH) A Ali Raza Khaki (Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA) A Atulya Aman Khosla M Mayur Sarangdhar (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH)

Abstract

e14667 Background: ICIs have changed the paradigm of cancer treatment, but their immune-modulating effects can lead to severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). VKH syndrome, a rare autoimmune disorder affecting pigmented tissues specifically uvea, skin, inner ear and meninges has been reported as case reports with ICIs, although real word data to elaborate on this association is limited. We aimed to assess the pharmacovigilance (PV), reporting rate, reaction outcomes of VKH syndrome using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: We identified 309,038 ICI-treated patients. VKH syndrome was reported in 203 (0.06%) cases. The ROR for VKH syndrome was significantly elevated for ICI-exposed patients compared to patients not exposed to ICIs (n = 410, 0.002%; OR: 34.06, p < 0.0001, 95% CI: 28.7936,40.3115). ICI exposure correlated with a 34-fold increase in the rates of VKH. On further stratification of targets of ICI, our analysis revealed that there was a significant predisposition to VKH with PD1 and CTLA4 agents compared to PDL1. VKH syndrome ROR with PD1 vs PDL1 (12.4, 95% CI 5.5, 28.05) and CTLA4 vs PDL1 (16.66, 95% CI 7.2, 32.4) with p < 0.0001. Results: We identified 309,038 ICI-treated patients. VKH syndrome was reported in 203 (0.06%) cases. The ROR for VKH syndrome was significantly elevated for ICI-exposed patients (ROR 34.06, 95% CI 28.79-40.31, p < 0.0001). Compared to the FAERS database incidence of VKH (n = 410, 0.002%), there was a 34-fold increase in VKH risk with ICI exposure. Further, there was a significant predisposition to VKH with PD1 and CTLA4 agents compared to PDL1. VKH syndrome ROR with PD1 vs PDL1 (12.4, 95% CI 5.5, 28.05) and CTLA4 vs PDL1 (16.66, 95% CI 7.2, 32.4) with p < 0.0001. Conclusions: Our analysis of the FAERS data suggests a potential association between ICI use and an increased risk of VKH syndrome. Although VKH syndrome appears to be a rare irAE, clinicians should be vigilant for its manifestations in patients receiving ICIs. In this analysis we also highlighted a potential increased likelihood of VKH syndrome through CTLA4 and PD1 targeting agents compared to PDL1 targeting agents. Early recognition and prompt management are essential to mitigate potential complications and improve patient outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm this association and explore the underlying mechanisms. Stratification of ICI targets and risk of VKH. PD1 PDL1 CTLA4 # patients 209,580 86,815 58,750 OR pval PD1 vs PDL1 180 (0.086%) 6 (0.007%) 12.4368 3.85E-20 PD1 vs CTLA4 180 (0.086%) 67 (0.114%) 0.7528 0.05392 PDL1 vs CTLA4 6 (0.007%) 67 (0.114%) 0.06053 3.17E-20

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (5)

K

Karan Jatwani

7George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington DC, United States

V

Venkatesh Kolli

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

A

Ali Raza Khaki

Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA

A

Atulya Aman Khosla

M

Mayur Sarangdhar

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH