Unidirectional synergy between ferroptosis and apoptosis reveals a novel therapeutic strategy for refractory AML

K Kazuharu Kamachi (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Leukemia, Houston, United States) H Hiroki Akiyama (1Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) R Ran Zhao (Chemical Engineering Experiment Teaching Center, School of Chemical Engineering) L Liang Zhang S Saurabh Kumar Gupta (1Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States) L Lauren Ostermann (1University of Texas MD Anderson, Pediatrics, Houston, United States) P Po Yee Mak (1Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) Y Yuji Otsuki (3FerroptoCure, Tokyo, Japan) O Osamu Nagano (3FerroptoCure, Tokyo, Japan) H Hideyuki Saya A Ayumu Taguchi N Natthakan Thongon S Simona Colla G Guillermo Garcia-Manero D Dong Shuxin (5The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States) A Alessia Lodi (2Dell Pediatric Research Institute, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas atAustin, Austin, United States) B Bing Carter (1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) S Steven Kornblau (1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States) M Michael Andreeff (1Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J Jo Ishizawa (1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Apoptosis resistance drives treatment failure in relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Targeting non-apoptotic forms of regulated cell death, such as ferroptosis, presents a promising strategy to circumvent this resistance. Ferroptosis is characterized by iron-dependent lipid peroxidation (LP), with glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) known as a major negative regulator among other factors. In AML, we previously reported that ferroptosis uniquely relies on mitochondrial LP, termed “mitochondrial ferroptosis” (Leukemia, 2024). Given that both apoptosis and ferroptosis are regulated by mitochondria in AML cells, we sought to explore the molecular crosstalk between these two distinct forms of cell death. Results: To test whether ferroptosis bypasses apoptotic resistance, we first treated venetoclax (VEN)-resistant AML cells including BAX/BAK double-knockout (DKO) AML cells with the selective GPX4 inhibitor ML210. ML210 effectively induced cell death in these models, confirming that ferroptosis involves a distinct, apoptosis-independent pathway. However, combining ML210 with VEN triggered synergistic cell death in both VEN-sensitive MOLM13 and VEN-resistant OCI-AML3 cells, with combination indices of 0.53 and 0.71, respectively, suggesting hitherto unknown molecular crosstalk between the two cell death pathways. The synergy was also observed in CD34⁺CD38⁻ leukemic stem/progenitor cells from VEN-resistant AML patients (combination indices < 0.5). Consistently, combined treatment with GPX4 inhibition and VEN significantly reduced peripheral leukemic burden in a patient-derived xenograft mouse model established from an R/R AML case previously treated with decitabine and VEN. To investigate the synergistic mechanisms between apoptosis and ferroptosis, we investigated whether ferroptosis induction supports apoptosis activation. The co-treatment with ML210 and VEN (ML210/VEN) reduced caspase 3 activation (cleaved caspase 3) compared to VEN alone. Notably, this suppression was reversed by the ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1), indicating that ferroptosis inhibits apoptosis induction. In contrast, VEN significantly enhanced LP when combined with ML210. Remarkably, the synergistic effects of ML210/VEN were completely abrogated by Fer-1, indicating that the ferroptotic component is the dominant driver of the observed synergy. These findings suggest a unidirectional interaction: BCL2 inhibition promotes ferroptosis, whereas ferroptosis suppresses apoptosis. Interestingly, the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoTEMPO completely blocked both LP and cell death induced by ML210/VEN, suggesting that mitochondrial ROS is a key trigger for the synergistic effects. Although VEN did not affect the transcriptional or protein expression of canonical ferroptosis regulators (e.g., GPX4, FSP1, ACSL4), metabolomics analysis revealed reduced glutathione levels. This suggests that BCL2 inhibition metabolically primes AML cells into a pro-ferroptotic state. Based on these findings, we optimized treatment using a sequential approach with VEN followed by ML210, which further enhanced LP and cell death while preserving caspase activation, compared to concomitant treatment. In vivo, VEN followed by doxycycline-inducible GPX4 knockdown significantly reduced leukemic burden and prolonged the survival in a xenograft mouse model. Strikingly, this sequential combinatory effect was completely abolished in BAX/BAK-DKO AML cells, suggesting a novel non-apoptotic role of BAX/BAK in ferroptosis regulation. Finally, given the current lack of clinically translatable GPX4 inhibitors, we tested FDA-approved repurposing agents as ferroptosis inducer and enhancer, demonstrating that this strategy is also operational by targeting alternative ferroptosis regulators besides GPX4. This finding further supports the clinical translatability of our therapeutic concept. Conclusion: Synergistic AML cell death caused by dual induction of mitochondrial ferroptosis and apoptosis involves paradoxical molecular interactions between the two cell death pathways: BCL2 inhibition enhances ferroptosis, which ultimately dominates the synergy despite the apoptosis-suppressive effects of GPX4 inhibition. Sequential induction of apoptosis followed by ferroptosis maximizes this synergy and may provide a promising future therapeutic strategy for R/R AML.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5050-5050
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (20)

K

Kazuharu Kamachi

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Leukemia, Houston, United States

H

Hiroki Akiyama

1Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

R

Ran Zhao

Chemical Engineering Experiment Teaching Center, School of Chemical Engineering

L

Liang Zhang

S

Saurabh Kumar Gupta

1Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States

L

Lauren Ostermann

1University of Texas MD Anderson, Pediatrics, Houston, United States

P

Po Yee Mak

1Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Y

Yuji Otsuki

3FerroptoCure, Tokyo, Japan

O

Osamu Nagano

3FerroptoCure, Tokyo, Japan

H

Hideyuki Saya

A

Ayumu Taguchi

N

Natthakan Thongon

S

Simona Colla

G

Guillermo Garcia-Manero

D

Dong Shuxin

5The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States

A

Alessia Lodi

2Dell Pediatric Research Institute, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas atAustin, Austin, United States

B

Bing Carter

1MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

S

Steven Kornblau

1University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Leukemia, Houston, United States

M

Michael Andreeff

1Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

Jo Ishizawa

1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States