Understanding the Role of Borohydride Doping in Electrochemical Stability of Argyrodite Li <sub>6</sub> PS <sub>5</sub> Cl Solid‐State Electrolyte

Y Yixian Wang (School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology of Ministry of Education) V Vikalp Raj (Materials Science and Engineering Program &amp; Texas Materials Institute (TMI) The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA) Q Qianqian Yan (School of Marine Technology and Equipment, State Key Laboratory of Tropic Ocean Engineering Materials and Materials Evaluation, Hainan Provincial Key Lab of Fine Chem, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering) C Cole D. Fincher Y Yuanshun Li (Chemical Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN 37830 USA) R Rohit Raj H Hugo Celio (Materials Science and Engineering Program Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Materials Institute The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA) A Andrei Dolocan (Materials Science and Engineering Program and Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering) G Guang Yang F Frédéric A. Perras (Chemical and Biological Sciences Division) Y Yet‐Ming Chiang (Department of Materials Science &amp; Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA) J John Watt (Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM 87545 USA) H Hong Fang P Puru Jena (Physics Department, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia 23284,) D David Mitlin (Materials Science and Engineering Program Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Materials Institute The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA)

Abstract

Abstract This work elucidates the mechanism by which lithium borohydride (LiBH 4 ) doping into argyrodite‐type Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LBH‐LPSCl) solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) enhances electrochemical stability. State‐of‐the‐art electrochemical performance is achieved with 5 wt% borohydride. Symmetric cells achieve critical current density (CCD) of 7.3 mA cm −2 , versus 2.6 mA cm −2 for baseline‐LPSCl. All solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) employing lithium metal and NMC811 cathode are stable over 400 cycles at 0.5C, with capacity retention of 83%. An anode‐free ASSB (AF‐ASSB) is stable over 600 cycles, with capacity loss of 0.04% per cycle. 5LBH‐LPSCl allows for enhanced low temperature operation, down to −14 °C. Yet the difference in electrolytes’ bulk microstructures and hardnesses are minimal, while ionic conductivity is incrementally improved (≈50%). Theoretical modeling indicates limited effect of substitution on thermodynamic stability of PS 4 3− units, which decompose when contacting Li. Instead, enhanced electrochemical stability is site‐specific kinetic effect: In situ electrodeposition experiments using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF‐SIMS) reveal tri‐layer SEI based predominately on Li 3 P/LiBH 4 /Li 2 S that blocks electrons while facilitating ion transport. This SEI manifests reduced interface resistance and accelerated nucleation and growth of metallic Li. With baseline‐LPSCl the SEI based on Li 3 P/Li 2 S is substantially thicker, generating localized stresses that promote interfacial cracking while cycling.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 37, Issue 40
Published October 01, 2025
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (15)

Y

Yixian Wang

School of Chemical Engineering & Technology, Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Technology of Ministry of Education

V

Vikalp Raj

Materials Science and Engineering Program &amp; Texas Materials Institute (TMI) The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA

Q

Qianqian Yan

School of Marine Technology and Equipment, State Key Laboratory of Tropic Ocean Engineering Materials and Materials Evaluation, Hainan Provincial Key Lab of Fine Chem, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

C

Cole D. Fincher

Y

Yuanshun Li

Chemical Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN 37830 USA

R

Rohit Raj

H

Hugo Celio

Materials Science and Engineering Program Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Materials Institute The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA

A

Andrei Dolocan

Materials Science and Engineering Program and Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering

G

Guang Yang

F

Frédéric A. Perras

Chemical and Biological Sciences Division

Y

Yet‐Ming Chiang

Department of Materials Science &amp; Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA 02139 USA

J

John Watt

Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos NM 87545 USA

H

Hong Fang

P

Puru Jena

Physics Department, Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia 23284,

D

David Mitlin

Materials Science and Engineering Program Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering and Texas Materials Institute The University of Texas at Austin Austin TX 78712 USA