Ultra-sensitive detection of clonal m-protein by mass spectrometry enhances detection of residual disease: Results from A phase 1 study of etentamig monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

A Aarif Ahsan (1AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, United States) A Adam Luo (1AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, United States) C Cesar Rodriguez Valdes (1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States) P Peter Voorhees (Department of Materials Science and Engineering) A Anita D'Souza (1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States) A Alfred Chung (6University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States) S Sascha Tuchman (6UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, United States) H Hana Safah (7Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States) J John Mckay (8Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States) K Katja Weisel R Raphael Teipel (Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany) N Neha Korde (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States) R Ravi Vij (11Division of Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO) S Shaji Kumar T Thomas Doerr (12AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, United States) R Rajvineeth Kumar Pothacamury (1AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, United States) C Chetasi Talati (12AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, United States) B Brenda Chyla (Abbvie, North Chicago, Illinois, United States) J Jeremy Ross (1AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Clonotypic peptide detection by mass spectrometry (MS) leverages monoclonal protein (M-protein) de novo sequencing and peptide quantification to enable ultra-sensitive blood-based monitoring of multiple myeloma (MM) patient M-protein kinetics. Etentamig is a 2nd generation BCMA x CD3 bispecific antibody that has shown promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) MM (Journal of Clinical Oncology, 43;16:suppl.7527). In the current study, we explored the depth and kinetics of MS M-protein response to etentamig monotherapy in serum samples from Phase 1 M22-466 (NCT03933735) study patients. The correlation between blood-based MS M-protein levels and bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity as determined by next generation sequencing (NGS) was also evaluated. Method: Clonotypic peptide MS using M-Insight (Sebia/Corgenix) was performed on serum samples from a subset of MRD evaluable patients enrolled into the Phase 1 (NCT03933735) clinical trial of etentamig monotherapy in patients with RRMM. Bone marrow MRD negativity (<10-5 and 10-6) analysis was determined by NGS (clonoSEQ, Adaptive Biotechnologies). Patient pre-treatment (Cycle [C] 1 Day [D] 1) serum samples were digested with proteolytic enzymes to permit sequencing of the M-protein heavy and light chain. Clonotypic peptides specific to the patient's complementarity-determining regions were selected for quantification by MS. Clonotypic peptide quantification by MS was performed on available tracking peripheral blood samples at C2D1, C3D1, C4D1, and C5D1 time points post etentamig monotherapy treatment. Results: Twenty patients who were MRD evaluable and treated with 40 mg and 60 mg doses of etentamig with available serum samples collected from C1D1–C5D1 time points were selected for M-Insight evaluation. Of the 20 patients, 16 (80%) had at least one clonotypic peptide identified prior to etentamig treatment that was utilized for tracking at subsequent time points. Rapid decline in MS M-protein levels was observed in patients treated with etentamig, which strongly correlated with the patients' best International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response. At C3D1 post etentamig treatment, patients with complete response (CR)/stringent CR (n=9) demonstrated a significant decline from MS M-protein levels (median: 1.8±0.9 g/dL at C1D1 to 0.03±0.2 g/dL at C3D1) (P<0.001). All evaluable subjects (n=16) had detectable MS M-protein at all time points (n=80). The lowest detectable M-protein level observed in the current dataset was 44 mg/dL (lower limit of quantitation of assay: 10 mg/dL). Subsequent analysis of differences in kinetics between MRD-negative (<10-5) (n=8) and MRD-positive (n=8) patients revealed a deeper reduction in M-protein levels for MRD-negative patients (median 0.02±0.2 g/dL at C3D1 compared with 0.4±0.3 g/dL at C3D1 for MRD-positive patients). Among the 8 patients who achieved MRD negativity at 10-5 threshold, 5 patients also achieved <10-6 threshold, and serum MS M-protein levels remained detectable in these patients (0.07±0.2 g/dL). Conclusions: Using MS-based clonotypic peptide detection, rapid and deep decline in serum M-protein levels was observed in RRMM patients treated with etentamig. Strong concordance was observed between MS M-protein levels and IMWG response, including in patients achieving MRD-negative CR at <10-5 and 10-6thresholds. Non-invasive and ultra-sensitive M-protein detection is feasible in MM and may serve as a key biomarker for enhancing the detection of residual disease in the future.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5813-5813
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (19)

A

Aarif Ahsan

1AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, United States

A

Adam Luo

1AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, United States

C

Cesar Rodriguez Valdes

1Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States

P

Peter Voorhees

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

A

Anita D'Souza

1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States

A

Alfred Chung

6University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, United States

S

Sascha Tuchman

6UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, United States

H

Hana Safah

7Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, United States

J

John Mckay

8Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, United States

K

Katja Weisel

R

Raphael Teipel

Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany

N

Neha Korde

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, New York, United States

R

Ravi Vij

11Division of Oncology, Washington University, St Louis, MO

S

Shaji Kumar

T

Thomas Doerr

12AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, United States

R

Rajvineeth Kumar Pothacamury

1AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, United States

C

Chetasi Talati

12AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, United States

B

Brenda Chyla

Abbvie, North Chicago, Illinois, United States

J

Jeremy Ross

1AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, United States