Ultra-hypofractionated versus hypofractionated radiotherapy in breast cancer: Real-world toxicity, efficiency, and implementation patterns.

M Maria Paula Uchima-Vera (Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia) M Manuela Estrada (2Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Hematology, Bogotá, Colombia) M Maria Alejandra Gomez-Gutierrez (Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia) T Tatiana Castañeda (Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia) E Elena Velasquez-Neira (Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia) I Isabella Correa (Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia) J Juliana Castro (Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia) T Tomas Romero (Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia) A Andrea Stefanía Pantoja Chica (Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia) P Paula Perez (Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia) Z Zamira Fernanda Gomez Giraldo (Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia) H Henry Vargas (Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia) E Erick Andrés Cantor J Javier Segovia B Beatriz Wills (Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia) Z Zoila Conrado (Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia) A Alvaro Mu?Oz (Fundaci?n Santa Fe de Bogot?, Bogotá, Colombia)

Abstract

e12722 Background: Hypofractionated regimens are standard for breast-conserving therapy due to equivalent efficacy and reduced treatment burden. Ultra-hypofractionated regimens have demonstrated non-inferior outcomes in randomized trials; however, real-world data on safety, efficiency, and implementation remain limited, particularly in Latin America. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients with breast cancer treated with curative or adjuvant external beam radiotherapy at a comprehensive cancer center in Colombia. Patients received hypofractionated or ultra-hypofractionated regimens. Clinicopathological variables, treatment duration, and RT-associated toxicity were collected. Comparisons between regimens were performed using bivariate analyses. Results: A total of 121 patients were included, of whom 97 (80.1%) received hypofractionated and 24 (19.8%) ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy. RT-related toxicity was infrequent and comparable between regimens (9.3% vs 4.2%), limited to skin toxicity. Ultra-hypofractionated RT was associated with a shorter treatment duration (5 vs 15 days). Ultra-hypofractionation was implemented across age groups, disease stages, and molecular subtypes, with no significant differences between regimens. A non-significant trend toward higher lobular histology was observed in the ultra-hypofractionated group. Three-year overall survival was high in both groups (98.9% vs 100%); survival analyses were descriptive due to a low number of events. Conclusions: Ultra-hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy demonstrated a safety profile comparable to hypofractionated regimens, with low rates of RT-related toxicity. Ultra-hypofractionation was implemented across a broad range of clinical characteristics, suggesting feasibility in routine practice. Survival outcomes were high in both groups and should be interpreted in the context of the limited number of events. These findings support ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy as an efficient and safe strategy that may optimize quality of care and resource utilization in breast cancer. Baseline characteristics and outcomes by radiotherapy regimen. Variable Hypofractionated (n=97) Ultra-hypofractionated (n=24) Age, years 53.9 59.4 AJCC stage I–II, n (%) 76 (80.0) 19 (82.6) AJCC stage III, n (%) 18 (20.0) 4 (17.4) Invasive lobulillar carcinoma, n (%) 8 (8.2) 7 (29.2) Invasive ductal carcinoma, n (%) 79 (81.4) 14 (58.3) Any RT-related toxicity, n (%) 9 (9.3) 1 (4.2)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

M

Maria Paula Uchima-Vera

Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia

M

Manuela Estrada

2Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Hematology, Bogotá, Colombia

M

Maria Alejandra Gomez-Gutierrez

Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia

T

Tatiana Castañeda

Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia

E

Elena Velasquez-Neira

Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia

I

Isabella Correa

Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia

J

Juliana Castro

Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia

T

Tomas Romero

Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia

A

Andrea Stefanía Pantoja Chica

Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia

P

Paula Perez

Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia

Z

Zamira Fernanda Gomez Giraldo

Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia

H

Henry Vargas

Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia

E

Erick Andrés Cantor

J

Javier Segovia

B

Beatriz Wills

Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Bogotá DC, Colombia

Z

Zoila Conrado

Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia

A

Alvaro Mu?Oz

Fundaci?n Santa Fe de Bogot?, Bogotá, Colombia