Turning policy implications into policy impact: Lessons from behavioral science in financial markets
Abstract
We describe how research can inform policymaking. We begin by summarizing the policy formation process, offering a framework illustrating how interactions between scientists and policymakers can provide mutual benefits. We then describe four research initiatives from the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Investor Research (OIR) as examples of how behavioral sciences can help inform policymakers. The first initiative established a probability-based nationally representative survey panel focused on US investor behavior. The remaining three examined investor communications for mutual fund benchmarks, emerging annuities (known as registered index-linked annuities), and mutual fund fee visuals. We conclude by synthesizing our work and describing practices that can help scientists have policy impact, not just policy implications.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (5)
Alycia Chin
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Investor Advocate
Katherine G. Carman
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Investor Advocate
Adam W. Craig
University of Kentucky, Gatton College of Business and Economics
Jonathan A. Cook
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Investor Advocate
David B. Zimmerman
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Investor Advocate