Tuning Microscopic Water Orientation in Nickel Single‐Atom Catalyst for Commercial‐Scale CO <sub>2</sub> Electrolysis to CO
Abstract
Abstract Electrochemical CO 2 reduction (ECR) to carbon monoxide (CO) offers a sustainable route for fuel and chemical production. Achieving commercial‐scale performance remains difficult, largely due to limited proton supply at high current densities. While single‐atom catalysts exhibit excellent CO 2 ‐to‐CO selectivity, their isolated active sites limit simultaneous optimization of CO 2 activation and water dissociation. Recent studies have highlighted the impact of interfacial water orientation on water dissociation kinetics, but this factor remains underexplored in ECR systems. Here, we demonstrate that modifying Ni–N 4 catalysts with CeO 2 clusters alters the microscopic orientation of interfacial water, thereby enabling industrial‐scale CO production. The CeO 2 ‐modified Ni–N 4 achieves nearly 100% CO Faradaic efficiency at current densities ranging from 50 to 600 mA cm ‒2 in flow cell and maintains 96% at 800 mA cm ‒2 . In a membrane electrode assembly, it sustains over 96% Faradaic efficiency across 50–400 mA cm ‒2 and maintains >95% for 118 h at 150 mA cm ‒2 . Experimental and computational analyses reveal that CeO 2 shifts the water orientation from oxygen‐down to hydrogen‐down configurations, thereby lowering the energy barriers for water dissociation and accelerating protonation. This work demonstrates that interfacial water orientation manipulation is a powerful strategy to enhance the performance of single‐atom catalysts in CO 2 electrolysis.
Article Details
Authors (8)
Qi‐Rui Wen
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Electrocatalytic Materials, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Energy Materials Service Safety College of Materials Science and Engineering Shenzhen University Shenzhen 518060 China
Shu‐Wen Wu
Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of Toronto M5S 3E4 Toronto Ontario Canada
Peng‐Xia Lei
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Electrocatalytic Materials, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Energy Materials Service Safety College of Materials Science and Engineering Shenzhen University Shenzhen 518060 China
Xiaoxiao Wei
College of Materials Science and Engineering
Jia‐Yi Wu
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Electrocatalytic Materials, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Energy Materials Service Safety College of Materials Science and Engineering Shenzhen University Shenzhen 518060 China
Xian‐Zhu Fu
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Electrocatalytic Materials Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Energy Materials Service Safety College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen University Shenzhen Guangdong China
Shao‐Qing Liu
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Electrocatalytic Materials, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Energy Materials Service Safety College of Materials Science and Engineering Shenzhen University Shenzhen 518060 China
Jing‐Li Luo
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Energy Electrocatalytic Materials Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New Energy Materials Service Safety College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen University Shenzhen Guangdong China