Triple‐Phase Boundaries Enable Selective Urea Production From Simulated Flue Gas in a Zero‐Gap Electrolyzer

M Meng Wang C Chenxi Luo (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering National University of Singapore Singapore 117585 Republic of Singapore) Z Ziyu Mi Y Yu‐Chia Chang (Department of Applied Chemistry and Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu 300 Taiwan) Y Yu‐Ting Chueh (Department of Applied Chemistry and Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu 300 Taiwan) P Ping Luo (State Key Laboratory for Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China) M Mingsheng Zhang (Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis #08-03, Singapore 138634, Singapore) J Jiguang Zhang (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering) R Ruoou Yang (State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, and School of Materials Science and Engineering) Q Qin Yang (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering) S Sibo Wang S Shuo Chen J Jinfeng Jia (Key Laboratory of Artificial Structures and Quantum Control (Ministry of Education), Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, School of Physics and Astronomy) W Wan Ru Leow Z Zainul Aabdin S Sung‐Fu Hung (Department of Applied Chemistry National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu Taiwan) Y Yanwei Lum (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering)

Abstract

Abstract Renewable energy‐powered co‐electrolysis of CO 2 and NO 3 − offers a promising pathway toward sustainable urea production. However, achieving high urea selectivity is challenging due to substantial competing side reactions. Here, we show that engendering a high density of CO 2 bubbles on the catalyst surface creates numerous triple‐phase boundaries that are key toward enhancing CO 2 versus NO 3 − availability for selective urea production. We implemented this strategy using a bipolar membrane in a zero‐gap electrolyzer, which allows for the in situ conversion of (bi)carbonate to CO 2 bubbles at the catalyst/electrolyte interface. Notably, we demonstrate that this electrolyzer system can utilize simulated flue gas (20% CO 2  + 5% O 2 ) for urea production. With a Cu 95 Ru 5 catalyst, we achieve a urea Faradaic efficiency of 58% at 2 V full‐cell voltage over an extended 30‐h period and a peak production rate of 35.46 mmol h −1  g cat −1 . Under these conditions, the Faradaic efficiency to hydrogen evolution and nitrate reduction are 14.7% and 21.6%, respectively. Strikingly, these results with simulated flue gas are comparable to previously reported systems that employ pure CO 2 . Our results introduce a simple yet effective design approach toward developing efficient electrolyzer systems for urea production.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 64, Issue 28
Published July 07, 2025
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (17)

M

Meng Wang

C

Chenxi Luo

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering National University of Singapore Singapore 117585 Republic of Singapore

Z

Ziyu Mi

Y

Yu‐Chia Chang

Department of Applied Chemistry and Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu 300 Taiwan

Y

Yu‐Ting Chueh

Department of Applied Chemistry and Center for Emergent Functional Matter Science National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu 300 Taiwan

P

Ping Luo

State Key Laboratory for Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

M

Mingsheng Zhang

Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis #08-03, Singapore 138634, Singapore

J

Jiguang Zhang

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

R

Ruoou Yang

State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, and School of Materials Science and Engineering

Q

Qin Yang

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

S

Sibo Wang

S

Shuo Chen

J

Jinfeng Jia

Key Laboratory of Artificial Structures and Quantum Control (Ministry of Education), Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, School of Physics and Astronomy

W

Wan Ru Leow

Z

Zainul Aabdin

S

Sung‐Fu Hung

Department of Applied Chemistry National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hsinchu Taiwan

Y

Yanwei Lum

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering