Treatments and outcomes of adult patients with TP53-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the real-life –Report of the prospective french observational ALFA-PPP study.

J Jean-Baptiste Micol (28Gustave-Roussy, université Paris-Saclay, Department of Hematology, Villejuif, France) R Raphaël Itzykson (6Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France) L Laure Farnault (28Service d’Hématologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille–Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France) T Thomas Cluzeau (15Service d’Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France) J Jean-Valère Malfuson (24Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, Clamart, France) S Sylvain Chantepie (10Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France) D Delphine Lebon (10CHU Amiens Picardie, Unité d'Hématologie clinique et Thérapie Cellulaire, Amiens, France) C Claire Bories (5CH LENS, LENS, France) R Ramy Rahme (9Hopital Avicenne, Avicenne, France) M Mathieu Leclerc (8Hôpital Henri Mondor, Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Créteil, France) A Ahmad Aljijakli (13Hematology Department, Centre Hospitalier d'Argenteuil, Argenteuil, France) L Laurene Fenwarth (Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Institut de Recherche contre le Cancer de Lille, University of Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France) A Alexandra COELHO (13Centre HAYEM - IRSL, Paris, France) R Renaud Buffet (14ALFA, Paris, France) E Emmanuel Raffoux C Christophe Willekens M Marie Sebert (1Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France) S Stéphane de Botton C Claude Preudhomme (Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Institut de Recherche contre le Cancer de Lille, University of Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France) H Hervé Dombret D Dominique Penther (27Laboratory of Genetics, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France) N Nicolas Duployez (Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Institut de Recherche contre le Cancer de Lille, University of Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France) E Elsa Bernard (2Institut Gustave Roussy, Computational Clinical Oncology Lab, UMR 981, Villejuif, France)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The prognosis of AML harboring TP53 mutations remains exceptionally poor. Clinical trials specifically designed for TP53-mutated AML are scarce and fail to represent real-world patient populations. Furthermore, most outcome data for TP53-mutated AML come from retrospective studies, where therapeutic decisions are frequently made without prior knowledge of molecular results. To address these gaps, we used data from the prospective ALFA-PPP registry (NCT04777916) to investigate the real-world management of patients with TP53-mutated AML. Methods We report the observations of the first 1,108 newly diagnosed adult AML patients (April 2022-August 2024) who had a centralized genomic profiling at diagnosis (50-gene NGS panel), focusing on the presence of TP53 mutation. Kaplan-Meier methodology was applied to estimate overall survival (OS). Multivariable analyses were performed using logistic regression or Cox regression, where appropriate. Results One hundred and sixty-five patients harbored at least one TP53 mutation at diagnosis. There were 89 males and 76 females (median age 72y [IQR, 64-77]; ECOG-PS 0-1/2/3-4, 98/42/21; median WBC 3.1 G/L [IQR, 1.7-7.3]; median marrow blast 31% [IQR, 22-54]). The numbers of patients with de novo, secondary and therapy-related AML (t-AML) were 90 (54%), 26 (16%) and 49 (30%), respectively. ELN-2022 cytogenetic risk was intermediate in 20 (12%), adverse in 137 (83%), and unclassifiable in 8 (5%). Median TP53 variant allele frequency was 44% (IQR 23-73), and 121 (74%) patients were classified as having bi-allelic TP53 mutations. In the full cohort, in multivariable analysis, older age (OR, 1.28 [95%CI, 1.09-1.52]; p=0.003), lower blast count (OR, 0.82 [95%CI, 0.75-0.90]; p<0.001), and adverse cytogenetic risk (OR, 30.98 [95%CI, 18.74-53.85]; p<0.001) were predictive of the presence of TP53 mutations. Secondary AML (OR, 0.88 [95%CI, 0.45-1.70]; p=0.714) or t-AML (OR, 1.39 [95%CI, 0.82-2.34]; p=0.217) were not significantly associated with TP53 mutation status. In the TP53-mutated cohort, treatment decision was intensive in 37 (22%) (median age, 63 years [56-66]; including 17 CPX-351), less intensive in 106 (64%) (median age, 75 years [68-79]; 78 AZA-VEN, 10 AZA, 18 unknown), and best supporting care in 16 (10%) patients, while the 5/6 remaining patients died before treatment decision. A total of 22/165 (13%) patients received an allogeneic stem cell transplant (HSCT) including 17 intensively and 5 less-intensively treated patients. With a median follow-up of 24 months (95% CI, 17-28), the median OS of intensively and less intensively treated patients was 11.7 (95% CI, 7.6-15.7) and 4.8 (95% CI, 3.6-6.2) months, respectively. The 12-month OS rates of intensively and less intensively treated patients were 48% (95%CI, 34-67%) and 19% (95% CI, 13-28%), respectively. The median OS of patients who underwent HSCT was 17.2 months (95% CI, 2.8-12.9). In these patients, multivariable Cox analysis evidenced older age (HR, 1.3 [95%CI 1.1-1.5]), higher ECOG (HR, 1.7 [95%CI, 1.2-2.5]; p=0.004), higher medullary blasts count (HR, 1.1 [95%CI, 1.01-1.2]; p= 0.03), t-AML (HR 1.7, [95%CI, 1.2-2.5]; p=0.006) and adverse ELN-2022 cytogenetic risk (HR, 2.5 [95%CI, 1.2-5.1]; p=0.02) as predictors of shorter OS. TP53 bi-allelic status had no impact on OS (HR 1.07, [95%CI, 0.66-1.7]; p=0.7). Finally, we assess the objective factors independently associated with the choice of a less intensive treatment option in the full cohort. Interestingly, the presence of TP53 mutations was strongly associated with a less intensive treatment option (OR, 6.5 [95%CI, 3.3-13.1]; p<0.001) while an adverse-risk cytogenetics was not (OR, 1.7 [95%CI, 0.98-2.8]; p=0.06), suggesting that the knowledge of the mutation may have influenced the treatment choice. The other factors associated with less intensive therapy were older age (OR, 8.2 [95%CI, 6.2-11.2]; p<0.001), higher ECOG (OR, 2.6 [95%CI 1.5-4.6]), AML type (OR, 2.5 [95%CI, 1-4-4.7]; p=0.003 for secondary AML, and OR, 2.6 [95%CI, 1.5-4.7]; p<0.001 for t-AML), and, unexpectedly, male sex (OR 1.8, [95%CI, 1.2-2.8]; p=0.004). Conclusion This prospective real-life AML patient cohort confirms that patients with TP53 mutations display distinct features and face a nearly incurable disease course, even when intensively treated. In absence of effective therapies, the knowledge of TP53 status at diagnosis appears to influence the decision to pursue less intensive treatment options.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 6386-6386
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (23)

J

Jean-Baptiste Micol

28Gustave-Roussy, université Paris-Saclay, Department of Hematology, Villejuif, France

R

Raphaël Itzykson

6Department of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

L

Laure Farnault

28Service d’Hématologie, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille–Hôpital de la Conception, Marseille, France

T

Thomas Cluzeau

15Service d’Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France

J

Jean-Valère Malfuson

24Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, Clamart, France

S

Sylvain Chantepie

10Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France

D

Delphine Lebon

10CHU Amiens Picardie, Unité d'Hématologie clinique et Thérapie Cellulaire, Amiens, France

C

Claire Bories

5CH LENS, LENS, France

R

Ramy Rahme

9Hopital Avicenne, Avicenne, France

M

Mathieu Leclerc

8Hôpital Henri Mondor, Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Créteil, France

A

Ahmad Aljijakli

13Hematology Department, Centre Hospitalier d'Argenteuil, Argenteuil, France

L

Laurene Fenwarth

Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Institut de Recherche contre le Cancer de Lille, University of Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France

A

Alexandra COELHO

13Centre HAYEM - IRSL, Paris, France

R

Renaud Buffet

14ALFA, Paris, France

E

Emmanuel Raffoux

C

Christophe Willekens

M

Marie Sebert

1Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France

S

Stéphane de Botton

C

Claude Preudhomme

Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Institut de Recherche contre le Cancer de Lille, University of Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France

H

Hervé Dombret

D

Dominique Penther

27Laboratory of Genetics, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France

N

Nicolas Duployez

Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Institut de Recherche contre le Cancer de Lille, University of Lille, CNRS, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lille, Lille, France

E

Elsa Bernard

2Institut Gustave Roussy, Computational Clinical Oncology Lab, UMR 981, Villejuif, France