Treatment patterns in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with co-occurring <i>PIK3CA</i> and <i>ESR1</i> mutations.
Abstract
1082 Background: PIK3CA and ESR1 mutations co-occur in 12-15% of patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. While FDA-approved PI3K inhibitors (PI3Ki) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) have advanced care for patients with biomarkers, treatment outcomes and optimal sequencing in those with co-occurring mutations remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with HR+/HER2- MBC and co-occurring PIK3CA and ESR1 mutations treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) between 2010 and 2024. Mutations were identified via MSK-IMPACT (tumor tissue) and MSK-ACCESS (ctDNA), with additional genomic data integrated from Guardant and Foundation One. Clinical and treatment data, including PI3Ki (alpelisib, inavolisib or investigational agents) and/or SERDs (fulvestrant or oral agents) were abstracted. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was assessed in patients with mutations identified prior to therapy initiation. Results: 3,166 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC were identified, including 1,444 (46%) with PIK3CA mutations, 664 (21%) with ESR1 mutations and 243 (8%) with co-occurring mutations. After excluding 26 patients with incomplete records or concurrent malignancies, the final cohort included 217 patients (7%), with 206 having MSK-IMPACT, 58 MSK-ACCESS, 49 Guardant, and 3 FoundationOne data. Of 217 patients, 77 (36%) received a PI3Ki after a median of 4 prior lines (range: 1–16), with 68 (88%) having prior CDK 4/6i. Single-agent SERD was administered to 46 patients (21%) after a median of 3 prior lines (range: 2–18), including 34 (74%) with prior CDK 4/6i. 8 patients received PI3Ki followed by SERD, and 7 received SERD followed by PI3Ki, either consecutively or with intervening treatments. The mPFS was 7.1 m with PI3Ki (95% CI: 4.6–9.3) and 4.0 m with single-agent SERD (95% CI: 3.4–9.8). In the SERD cohort, earlier line of treatment (1–2 vs. 3+; HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09–0.90) and liver metastasis (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.10–10.6) were independently associated with PFS. CDK 4/6i duration ≥12 m in the SERD cohort was associated with improved mPFS in stratified analysis (9.8 vs. 2.7 m; log-rank p = 0.002). For patients treated with PI3Ki followed by SERD (n = 8), mPFS1 was 8.9 m (95% CI: 5.6, NE) and mPFS2 was 6.0 m (95% CI: 2.3, NE). SERD to PI3Ki (n = 7) yielded a mPFS1 of 3.4 m (95% CI: 1.8, NE) and mPFS2 of 10.0 m (95% CI: 1.6, NE). Conclusions: Prior CDK4/6i ≥ 12 m in patients with co-occurring mutations treated with a SERD was associated with significantly improved PFS, potentially reflecting a conditioning effect of prior therapy. The total PFS (PFS1 + PFS2) in patients treated with sequential targeted therapies was similar; however, small sample sizes and potential confounders in this retrospective cohort limit definitive interpretations. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine optimal sequencing strategies.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Jimmitti Teysir
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Sherry Shen
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Charlie White
Yuan Chen
School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Pedram Razavi
Komal L. Jhaveri
Breast and Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York