Treatment of low-grade intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with UGN-102: Results of the phase 3 ATLAS and ENVISION studies.

S Sandip M. Prasad (Morristown Medical Center/Atlantic Health System and Garden State Urology, Morristown, NJ) M Marc Bjurlin D Dimitar Shishkov (Department of Urology, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, Plovdiv, Bulgaria) N Nikola V. Mihaylov (Department of Urology, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, Plovdiv, Bulgaria) A Alexandre Khuskivadze (Urology Department, Georgia Israel Joint Clinic Gidmedi, Tbilisi, Georgia) P Pencho Genov (Urology Department, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Kanev, Ruse, Bulgaria) V Vasyl Terzi (Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Varna Military Medical Academy, Varna, Bulgaria) M Max Kates W Willliam C. Huang (NYU Langone Urology Associates, New York, NY) M Michael J. Louie (UroGen Pharma, Princeton, NJ) S Sunil Raju (UroGen Pharma, Princeton, NJ) B Brent Burger (UroGen Pharma, Princeton, NJ) A Andrew Meads (UroGen Pharma, Princeton, NJ) B Brian Hu (Department of Urology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA)

Abstract

e16595 Background: In the ATLAS and ENVISION phase 3 studies (NCT04688931/NCT05243550) patients with low-grade intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (LG-IR-NMIBC) were treated with UGN-102, a reverse thermal hydrogel containing mitomycin. Primary efficacy and safety results were previously reported for the individual studies; here we report additional data. Methods: In the randomized controlled ATLAS study, patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent LG-IR-NMIBC were randomized to 6 weekly intravesical instillations of UGN-102 (n=142) or transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) (n=140). In the single-arm ENVISION study, patients with recurrent LG-IR-NMIBC received 6 weekly intravesical instillations of UGN-102 (n=240). In both trials, patients were examined for recurrence of bladder cancer using cystoscopy, urine cytology testing, and for-cause biopsy at 3 months, and in those with a complete response (CR), at regular intervals thereafter. Duration of response (DoR) was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: In ATLAS and ENVISION, most patients were age ≥65 years (60%, 68%), white (99%, 98%), and male (70%, 61%). In ATLAS, 92 patients (64.8%) in the UGN-102 arm and 89 patients (63.6%) in the TURBT arm had a CR at 3 months. Among patients achieving a CR at 3 months in ATLAS, the probability of remaining event (recurrence, progression, or death) free 12 months later was 79.7% in the UGN-102 arm vs 67.7% in the TURBT arm; the most common event was LG disease recurrence (Table). In ENVISION, 79.6% had a CR at 3 months, and the probability of remaining event free 12 months later was 82.3%; the most common event was recurrence of LG disease (Table). Median DoR was not estimable in any arm due to low event rates, with a between arms hazard ratio in ATLAS of 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24, 0.86) favoring the UGN-102 arm. The most common adverse event with UGN-102 in both studies was dysuria, occurring in 30.4% in ATLAS and 22.5% in ENVISION. Conclusions: In both studies, CR rate in patients initially treated with UGN-102 was robust, with the majority of patients remaining event free at 12 months follow-up. These results demonstrate that treatment with UGN-102 results in a high and clinically meaningful durable CR rate in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent LG-IR-NMIBC. UGN-102 may represent a valuable nonsurgical treatment option for these patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04688931 / NCT05243550 . ATLAS ENVISION UGN-102 TURBT UGN-102 CR at 3 months 92/142 (64.8%) 89/140 (63.6%) 191/240 (79.6%) CR rate (95% CI) 64.8 (56.3, 72.6) 63.6 (55.0, 71.5) 79.6 (73.9, 84.5) Median follow-up time for DoR, months (95% CI) 12.45 (12.02, 14.13) 12.16 (11.89, 12.75) 13.86 (12.19, 14.52) Event occurrence 18/92 (19.6%) 24/89 (27.0%) 33/191 (17.3%) LG disease 15/92 (16.3%) 17/89 (19.1%) 27/191 (14.1%) HG disease 3/92 (3.3%) 6/89 (6.7%) 4/191 (2.1%) Death 0 1/89 (1.1%) 2/191 (1.0%) HG, high grade.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

S

Sandip M. Prasad

Morristown Medical Center/Atlantic Health System and Garden State Urology, Morristown, NJ

M

Marc Bjurlin

D

Dimitar Shishkov

Department of Urology, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

N

Nikola V. Mihaylov

Department of Urology, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, Plovdiv, Bulgaria

A

Alexandre Khuskivadze

Urology Department, Georgia Israel Joint Clinic Gidmedi, Tbilisi, Georgia

P

Pencho Genov

Urology Department, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Kanev, Ruse, Bulgaria

V

Vasyl Terzi

Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Varna Military Medical Academy, Varna, Bulgaria

M

Max Kates

W

Willliam C. Huang

NYU Langone Urology Associates, New York, NY

M

Michael J. Louie

UroGen Pharma, Princeton, NJ

S

Sunil Raju

UroGen Pharma, Princeton, NJ

B

Brent Burger

UroGen Pharma, Princeton, NJ

A

Andrew Meads

UroGen Pharma, Princeton, NJ

B

Brian Hu

Department of Urology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA