Translation and cultural adaption of MacLeod Clark professional identity scale among Chinese therapy students

X Xiaoyi Shu C Chun Feng C Chak-Lam Ip X Xin Zhang N Nan Yang (State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Beijing Engineering Center for Hierarchical Catalysts) S Shibo Li (Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute) J Jia Han W Weibing Wu A Alec Knight

Abstract

Background Fostering a strong professional identity (PI) enhances career fulfillment. In China, therapy education is undergoing development, integrating both Western and traditional health concepts, causing inconsistent PI among therapy students. To date, no validated tools exist to measure and monitor PI of Chinese therapy students. This study aimed to translate and validate the 9-item MacLeod Clark Professional Identity Scale (MCPIS-9) for this purpose. Design This study involved translation and cultural adaptation of the MCPIS-9, followed by a rigorous assessment of its model fit and psychometric properties using data collected via an online questionnaire. Methods A forward- and backward- translation process was conducted. Content validity was evaluated using item-level content validity index (I-CVI) and scale level content validity index average method (S-CVI/Ave). Therapy students across all grades at undergraduate and postgraduate levels in China were eligible. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) examined the underlying factor structure. Model fit was evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) and Root Mean Square of Error of Approximation (RMSEA). Convergent validity was assessed through Pearson’s correlations coefficient (r) with the Professional Identity Scale for Health Students and Professionals (PISHSP). Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach’s Alpha (Cα) and McDonald’s Omega (ω). Results A total of 1054 students participated. Content validity was excellent (I-CVI = 0.86–1.0, S-CVI/Ave = 0.98). EFA indicated a two-factor structure with acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.978; TLI = 0.968; SRMR = 0.033; RMSEA = 0.063). Reliability was strong (Cα = 0.835; ω = 0.817). Convergent validity demonstrated a strong correlation (r = 0.75) with the PISHSP. Conclusions The Chinese MCPIS-9 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing PI among therapy students. Future research could focus on refining item 4 of this tool, potentially through further exploration of therapy students’ perceptions of PI within the unique context of the Chinese healthcare system.

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 20, Issue 1
Published January 28, 2025
Pages e0318101
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (9)

X

Xiaoyi Shu

C

Chun Feng

C

Chak-Lam Ip

X

Xin Zhang

N

Nan Yang

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Beijing Engineering Center for Hierarchical Catalysts

S

Shibo Li

Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute

J

Jia Han

W

Weibing Wu

A

Alec Knight