Transcriptome classification of PTEN inactivation to predict survival benefit from docetaxel at start of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic prostate cancer (PC): An ancillary study of the STAMPEDE trials.
Abstract
5003 Background: Docetaxel (Doce) is effective for metastatic (M1) PC but its effect is varied. Combining Doce and hormone therapy can improve overall survival (OS) but is not appropriate for all. We previously reported the mRNA Decipher test predicts benefit from Doce. We then used transcriptome-wide data to interrogate differential associations with outcome for biologically-relevant pathways. Methods: PTEN inactivation using a previously described signature (Liu et al JCI, 2021; active score <= 0.3, inactive: score > 0.3) and Decipher score (high > 0.8, lower <= 0.8) was determined from transcriptome-wide expression data generated in a clinically-accredited lab on prostate tumor from M1 patients (pts) randomized 1:1 to ADT vs ADT + Doce +/- zoledronic acid (ZA) or ADT vs ADT + Abi (abiraterone acetate + prednisone) in the STAMPEDE protocol (Oct 2005-Jan 2014). Cox survival models were fitted with an interaction between treatment allocation and PTEN activity, adjusted for age, WHO PS, pre-ADT PSA, Gleason score, T-stage, N stage (N0, N1), metastatic volume (CHAARTED definition, high [HV] or low [LV]). Hypotheses were tested using partial likelihood ratios. Primary endpoint was OS. Results: We generated transcriptome-wide profiles on 832 M1 pts with no notable differences from the full M1 trial cohort (N=2224). 657 (79%) were reported to have died. 50% of tumors were classified as PTEN inactive (N=419). PTEN mRNA score distribution was similar across HV and LV disease (p=0.310). PTEN inactivity associated with shorter OS in pts allocated ADT+Abi (N=182; HR=1.56, 95%CI: 1.06-2.31) but not in pts allocated ADT+Doce+/-ZA (N=279; HR=0.93, 95%CI: 0.70-1.24). We found strong evidence (p=0.002) of an interaction between PTEN inactivation and Doce sensitivity: PTEN inactive pts benefited from Doce (HR=0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.76) unlike PTEN active pts (HR=1.05, 95% CI 0.77-1.43). This was consistent in LV (N=244; PTEN inactive HR=0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.86; PTEN active HR=0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.40) and HV (N=295; PTEN inactive, HR=0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.88; PTEN active HR=1.23, 95% CI: 0.83-1.81). In pts randomized to Abi, treatment effect was uniform (PTEN inactive HR=0.52, 95% CI 0.36-0.73; PTEN active HR=0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.77; p=0.784). We estimated adding Doce for tumors classified as PTEN inactive and high Decipher reduced the hazards of death by 45% (HR 0.55, 99% CI 0.34-0.89). Conclusions: Prostate tumors classified as high Decipher and PTEN inactive have a 45% reduction in hazard of death when Doce is added to ADT. This biomarker should be tested in pts considered for triplet therapy of ADT + Abi + Doce.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Emily Grist
University College London, London, United Kingdom
Peter Dutey-Magni
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit , London, United Kingdom
Marina Parry
1University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Larissa Mendes
University College London, London, United Kingdom
Ashwin Sachdeva
Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
James A. Proudfoot
Veracyte Inc, San Francisco, CA
Anis Hamid
Mazlina Ismail
Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute
Lia De Paula Oliveira
Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Oluwademilade Dairo
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Sharanpreet Lall
University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom
Claire Amos
Medical Research Council at UCL, London, United Kingdom
Mahesh Parmar
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, United Kingdom
Elai Davicioni
Tamara L. Lotan
Christopher Sweeney
South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Louise C. Brown
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom
Noel W. Clarke
Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Nicholas David James
The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Gerhardt Attard