Transarterial chemoembolization combined with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Abstract
e16223 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ,demonstrating a promising option. To compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab (TACE-Ate-Bev) or TACE combined with lenvatinib plus Sintilimab(TACE-Len-Sin) as first-line treatments for advanced HCC. Methods: We assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate(ORR), and adverse events between the TACE-Ate-Bev group (n = 108) and the TACE-Len-Sin group (n = 160) as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to minimize bias. Efficacy was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Results: After IPTW, the TACE-Ate-Bev group significantly extended the median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared to theTACE-Len-Sin group (mOS: 27.9 months vs. 17.03 months, P < 0.001; mPFS: 13.06 months vs. 8.23months, P < 0.001). A higher ORR was observed in TACE-Ate-Bev group, by either RECIST v1.1 or modified RECIST (37.03% vs 33.13%;50.0% vs 33.73%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 18 patients (16.7%) in TACE-Ate-Bev group and 28 patients (17.5%) in TACE-Len-Sin group.The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GB) was significantly higher in the TACE-Ate-Bev group compared to the TACE-Len-Sin group (10.8% vs. 6.3%). Notably, GB was significantly more frequent in patients with portal hypertension (PHT) compared to those without, in both the TACE-Bev-Ate group (28.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001) and the TACE-Len-Sin group (24.5% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: TACE-Ate-Bev demonstrated superior OS and PFS compared to TACE-Len-Sin as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, with an acceptable safety. Management of PHT in patients with advanced HCC is critical to optimizing patient outcomes.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Ningning Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Yawei Du
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Engineering Research Center of Seawater Utilization of Ministry of Education Hebei University of Technology Tianjin P. R. China
Yuexi Yu
Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
Qiang Wu
Jiangsu Cancer Hospital Nanjing China
Wei Bai
Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale
Wei Zhang
Shuwen Zhang
Wenwen Zhu
Hao Yu
Xuanchen Liu
Ming Luo
Huiru Liu
Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
Yiyan Zhang
Kaipeng Liu
Yiming Huo
Province‐Ministry Co‐construction Collaborative Innovation Center of Hebei Photovoltaic Technology, Hebei Key Laboratory of Optic‐electronic Information and Materials College of Physics Science and Technology Hebei University Baoding Hebei 071002 China
Guohong Han
Department of Liver Diseases and Interventional Radiology, Digestive Diseases Hospital, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China
Haipeng Yu
State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Institute of Microbial Technology
Jihui Hao
Wei Lu