Transarterial chemoembolization combined with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

N Ningning Zhang (State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences) Y Yawei Du (School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Engineering Research Center of Seawater Utilization of Ministry of Education Hebei University of Technology Tianjin P. R. China) Y Yuexi Yu (Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China) Q Qiang Wu (Jiangsu Cancer Hospital Nanjing China) W Wei Bai (Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale) W Wei Zhang S Shuwen Zhang W Wenwen Zhu H Hao Yu X Xuanchen Liu M Ming Luo H Huiru Liu (Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China) Y Yiyan Zhang K Kaipeng Liu Y Yiming Huo (Province‐Ministry Co‐construction Collaborative Innovation Center of Hebei Photovoltaic Technology, Hebei Key Laboratory of Optic‐electronic Information and Materials College of Physics Science and Technology Hebei University Baoding Hebei 071002 China) G Guohong Han (Department of Liver Diseases and Interventional Radiology, Digestive Diseases Hospital, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China) H Haipeng Yu (State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Institute of Microbial Technology) J Jihui Hao W Wei Lu

Abstract

e16223 Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ,demonstrating a promising option. To compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab (TACE-Ate-Bev) or TACE combined with lenvatinib plus Sintilimab(TACE-Len-Sin) as first-line treatments for advanced HCC. Methods: We assessed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate(ORR), and adverse events between the TACE-Ate-Bev group (n = 108) and the TACE-Len-Sin group (n = 160) as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to minimize bias. Efficacy was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria. Results: After IPTW, the TACE-Ate-Bev group significantly extended the median overall survival (mOS) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) compared to theTACE-Len-Sin group (mOS: 27.9 months vs. 17.03 months, P < 0.001; mPFS: 13.06 months vs. 8.23months, P < 0.001). A higher ORR was observed in TACE-Ate-Bev group, by either RECIST v1.1 or modified RECIST (37.03% vs 33.13%;50.0% vs 33.73%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 18 patients (16.7%) in TACE-Ate-Bev group and 28 patients (17.5%) in TACE-Len-Sin group.The incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GB) was significantly higher in the TACE-Ate-Bev group compared to the TACE-Len-Sin group (10.8% vs. 6.3%). Notably, GB was significantly more frequent in patients with portal hypertension (PHT) compared to those without, in both the TACE-Bev-Ate group (28.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001) and the TACE-Len-Sin group (24.5% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: TACE-Ate-Bev demonstrated superior OS and PFS compared to TACE-Len-Sin as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, with an acceptable safety. Management of PHT in patients with advanced HCC is critical to optimizing patient outcomes.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

N

Ningning Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Y

Yawei Du

School of Chemical Engineering and Technology Engineering Research Center of Seawater Utilization of Ministry of Education Hebei University of Technology Tianjin P. R. China

Y

Yuexi Yu

Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China

Q

Qiang Wu

Jiangsu Cancer Hospital Nanjing China

W

Wei Bai

Hefei National Research Center for Physical Sciences at the Microscale

W

Wei Zhang

S

Shuwen Zhang

W

Wenwen Zhu

H

Hao Yu

X

Xuanchen Liu

M

Ming Luo

H

Huiru Liu

Department of Hepatobiliary Oncology, Liver Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China

Y

Yiyan Zhang

K

Kaipeng Liu

Y

Yiming Huo

Province‐Ministry Co‐construction Collaborative Innovation Center of Hebei Photovoltaic Technology, Hebei Key Laboratory of Optic‐electronic Information and Materials College of Physics Science and Technology Hebei University Baoding Hebei 071002 China

G

Guohong Han

Department of Liver Diseases and Interventional Radiology, Digestive Diseases Hospital, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, China

H

Haipeng Yu

State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Institute of Microbial Technology

J

Jihui Hao

W

Wei Lu