Toxicities on the E1910 phase III randomized trial of blinatumomab plus chemotherapy in adults with BCR:ABL-1 negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Abstract
Abstract E1910 evaluated the addition of blinatumomab to chemotherapy in adults with B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The addition of blinatumomab in patients (pts) with measurable residual disease (MRD) negative (neg) B-ALL significantly improved both relapse-free and overall survival (NEJM 2024; 391: 320-33)1. Given the increasing use of blinatumomab and the E1910 backbone chemotherapy regimen, we evaluated > Grade 3 toxicities on this trial in further detail. We assessed toxicity among the MRD-neg pts by age, gender, body mass index (BMI), combined cytogenetic-molecular risk, and number of cycles of blinatumomab received. We also evaluated toxicities during induction since this trial used a modified chemotherapy backbone. Methods: The eligibility, combined cytogenetic-molecular risk, and treatment have been previously described.1 All toxicities were > Grade 3 by CTCAE version 4 with at least a possible relationship to treatment. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the occurrence and rates of toxicities and Fisher's exact test was used to compare differences in proportions between groups. Analysis of induction included all pts who started treatment. Analysis of Step 3 toxicities included MRD-neg pts who started treatment on the blinatumomab (n=111) or chemotherapy only arm (n=112). Results: Pt characteristics: For induction (n=488), median age was 51 years (yrs) (range 30-70); 48.6% female. Combined cytogenetic-molecular risk: favorable (13.5%); intermediate (12.9%); no risk assigned (16.2%); unfavorable (57.4%). For induction, we compared toxicities for E1910 (n=488) to pts treated on a prior young adult study (n=289) (C10403) (Blood Adv 2021; 5(2): 504-12). The incidence of hyperglycemia (8% vs. 31.1%, p< 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increase (6.1% vs. 12.8%, p=0.002), alanine aminotransferase increase (ALT) (11.7% vs. 28.7%, p< 0.001), and hyperbilirubinemia (11% vs. 19%, p=0.002) were significantly lower in E1910 pts. The incidence of pancreatitis (1.8%), thromboembolic events (4.5%), and febrile neutropenia (25.4%) in E1910 was similar to C10403. Toxicities in the MRD-neg pts in the blinatumomab arm (n=111): Despite a high incidence of neutropenia (74.8%) and thrombocytopenia (55.9%) in Step 3, there was a relatively low incidence of sepsis (7.2%), bacteremia (1.8%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (3.6%) and neurologic adverse events (0-6.3%). There was a higher incidence of neurological or psychiatric events in the blinatumomab arm (23%) versus chemotherapy arm (5%) (p < 0.001) when all events were combined. There was a numerically higher incidence of ataxia (4.4% vs. %, p=0.16) and dysphasia (11.1% vs. 3%, p=0.12) in pts > 55 yrs and a higher incidence of neutropenia (80.3% vs. 66.7%, p=0.12) and thrombocytopenia (62.1% vs. 46.7%, p=0.12) in the younger pts (age < 55 yrs). In pts with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (vs. > 30 kg/m2), there was a significantly higher incidence of leukopenia (51.7% vs. 26.4%, p=0.007) and thrombocytopenia (65.5% vs. 45.3%, p=0.037). However, this did not translate into an increased incidence of bleeding or infectious complications. By gender, females had a higher numerical incidence of AST increase (8.8% vs. 0%, p=0.057) and CRS (7% vs. 0% p=0.12); whereas males had a higher incidence of catheter- related infections (7.4% vs. 0%, p=0.05) and hyperglycemia (11.1% vs. 3.5%, p=0.16). A little more than half (56.8%) of pts received 4 cycles of blinatumomab with the remainder of pts receiving 1 (10.8%), 2 (28.8%), or 3 cycles (3.6%). Pts receiving 3-4 cycles of blinatumomab vs. 1-2 cycles of blinatumomab had a statistically higher incidence of anemia (38.8% vs. 6.8%, p< 0.001), neutropenia (98.5% vs. 38.6%, p< 0.001), and thrombocytopenia (83.6% vs. 13.6%, p< 0.001), likely related to being on treatment for a longer period of time. Conclusions: Blinatumomab was well tolerated with no significant toxicity differences noted by age, gender, or number of cycles of blinatumomab received. Pts with a lower BMI did have an increased incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, possibly related to flat dosing of the drug. However, this did not translate into increased complications. Toxicites during induction were notably few, which suggests that this backbone with age adjustments may serve as a good backbone for future trials. Blinatumomab is being evaluated with low dose chemotherapy and other targeted agents in ongoing trials.
Article Details
Authors (39)
Anjali Advani
6Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
Li Chen
Zhuoxin Sun
2Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Ryan Mattison
3University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, United States
Elisabeth Paietta
4Montefiore Medical Center, Moses Campus, Bronx, United States
Yanming Zhang
Janis Racevskis
4Montefiore Medical Center, Moses Campus, Bronx, United States
Hillard Lazarus
6Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
Jacob Rowe
7Rambam Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
Dan Arber
8Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, United States
Matthew Wieduwilt
9UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, United States
Michaela Liedtke
Julie Bergeron
10Hopital Masionneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Canada
Brent Wood
11University of Washington, Seattle, United States
Keith Pratz
12Johns Hopkins University/ Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, United States
Shira Dinner
13Northwestern University, Chicago, United States
Noelle Frey
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology–Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Steven Gore
Bhavana Bhatnagar
16Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, United States
Ehab Atallah
17Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United States
Geoffrey Uy
18Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, United States
Deepa Jeyakumar
19UC Irvine Health Cancer Center-Newport, Orange, United States
Tara Lin
20University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, United States
Cheryl Willman
21Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Nikolai Podoltsev
15Yale University, New Haven, United States
Daniel Deangelo
2Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Shejal Patel
22Virginia Commonwealth University/ Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, United States
Michelle Elliott
21Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Dimitrios Tzachanis
24UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, United States
Pankit Vachhani
25University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, United States
Rupali Bhave
26Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, United States
Elad Sharon
Richard Little
27National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
Harry Erba
28Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
Richard Stone
Selina Luger
14University of Pennsylvania/ Abrahmson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, United States
Charles Mullighan
9Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
Martin Tallman
5Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Mark Litzow
21Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States