Toward a Unified Mechanistic Understanding of Polymer Electrolytes for Advanced Solid‐State Batteries
Abstract
ABSTRACT Polymer electrolytes (PEs) are widely regarded as a promising platform for solid‐state batteries (SSBs), offering the potential to simultaneously achieve high energy density with improved safety. However, in current literature, PEs spanning liquid‐percolated gels, liquid‐assisted quasi‐solids, and truly polymer‐governed solids are often indiscriminately grouped as solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs), obscuring their distinct ion transport mechanisms, interfacial behaviors, and practical performance constraints, and leading to misleading performance comparisons and unrealistic expectations regarding solid‐state operation. Herein, we establish a mechanistic framework that categorizes PEs into gel polymer electrolytes (GPEs), quasi‐solid polymer electrolytes (QSPEs), and all‐solid polymer electrolytes (ASPEs) based on their dominant ion‐solvation environment and transport pathways. By systematically analyzing the ion‐transport mechanisms, interfacial behaviors, and performance‐limiting features associated with each PE class, we clarify their defining characteristics and mechanism‐imposed limitations. Accordingly, we outline category‐specific research priorities and highlight the necessity of mechanism‐driven materials design, transparent definitions and reporting, and application‐relevant benchmarking. This unified Perspective lays a foundation for consistent interpretation, meaningful comparison across PE systems, and more rational materials design toward the advancement of PE‐enabled SSBs.
Article Details
Authors (16)
Jing Chen
Han Chen
GBRCE for Functional Molecular Engineering, LIFM, IGCME, School of Chemistry
Michel Armand
Centre for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE)
Gunther Brunklaus
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz-Institute Münster (IMD-4), Corrensstraße 46, 48149 Münster, Germany
Jang Wook Choi
School of Chemical and Biological Engineering and Institute of Chemical Process, Seoul National University
Yan‐Bing He
Institute of Materials Research Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School Tsinghua University Shenzhen Guangdong 518055 P.R. China
Bumjoon J. Kim
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea
Seung Woo Lee
Stefano Passerini
Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU)
Meera Mohankumar
Department of Radiation Science and Technology Faculty of Applied Sciences Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands
Patrick Théato
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Chemical Technology and Polymer Chemistry (ITCP), Engesserstraße 18, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Marnix Wagemaker
Section Storage of Electrochemical Energy, Radiation Science and Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences
Martin Winter
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Helmholtz-Institute Münster (IMD-4), Corrensstraße 46, 48149 Münster, Germany
Qiang Zhang
Shujiang Ding
Engineering Research Center of Energy Storage Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry
Zhiqun Lin
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering