Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A single-center, real-world study in Mexico.
Abstract
72 Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a pivotal treatment approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Despite its importance, there is a significant lack of comparative research examining the outcomes of chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy (CRT) in comparison to TNT within the Mexican population. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 183 patients with LARC from January 2018 to December 2022. We aimed to determine the differences in Recurrence Free Survival (RFS), Overall Survival (OS) and Pathological Complete Response by RYAN (PCR) between patients receiving TNT vs CRT though Chi square, Kaplan-Meier Meier and Cox regression methods. Results: Median age was 57 years; 55.7% of cases were male. Lower rectum was affected in 72.7%, middle in 20.2% and 7.1% in lower rectum. TNT therapy was administered in 111 cases (60.7%) an CRT in 72 cases (39.3%). Adverse Events were present in 41% in the TNT group and 33.3% in the CRT group (p 0.009). Mean RFS between CRT and TNT groups was not significant (70 months vs 63 months, p=0.323). In multivariate analyses, TNT was an independent predictor for OS (B – 1.507; HR 0.222, IC 95% 0.070-0.7; p=0.026) and PCR by RYAN was also shown to be an independent predictor of survival (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Patients who underwent TNT demonstrated enhanced OS. In our cohort, PCR by RYAN appears to serve as a surrogate marker for OS and RFS. It is imperative to carefully select patients to ensure complete therapeutic responses while avoiding overtreatment, which may result in significant toxicity. Multivariate analyses for overall survival (Cox regression). B SE Wald df Sig. Exp(B) 95.0% CI Exp(B) Inferior Superior Neoadjuvant therapy -1.507 .587 6.590 1 .010 .222 .070 .700 RYAN 20.845 3 .000 RYAN 0 -4.345 1.198 13.152 1 .000 .013 .001 .136 RYAN 1 -.570 .655 .758 1 .384 .566 .157 2.041 RYAN 2 -2.253 .643 12.260 1 .000 .105 .030 .371 Age .038 .025 2.331 1 .127 1.039 .989 1.091 Lymph node negative -1.045 .718 2.122 1 .145 .352 .086 1.435 Grade 2.941 2 .230 Grade(1) -12.403 514.292 .001 1 .981 .000 .000 . Grade(2) 1.296 .756 2.940 1 .086 3.654 .831 16.075 ACE at diagnosis -.107 .045 5.621 1 .018 .899 .823 .982 Site 8.484 2 .014 Middle rectum 2.568 1.043 6.058 1 .014 13.043 1.687 100.814 Lower rectum .979 .871 1.265 1 .261 2.663 .483 14.675
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (11)
Marytere Herrera
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
Jairo Rubio
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
Luis Fernando Sanchez
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
Rocio Pamela Martinez
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
Dr. Consuelo Diaz
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
German Calderillo Ruiz
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
Mariana Sayako Miyagui
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
Diana Alejandra Rubio-Delgado
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
Samuel Díaz
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
Lorena Lagarde
Gastrointestinal Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Tlalpan, DF, Mexico
Erika Ruiz
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico