Thyroid diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in China: Multicenter study of diagnosis, clinical features, treatment efficacy, prognostic factors, and genomic alterations
Abstract
Abstract Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, genomic mutational profiles, prognostic determinants, survival outcomes, and current diagnostic/therapeutic landscape of thyroid diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (TDLBCL), distinguishing primary from secondary subtypes. Methods: A multi-center retrospective analysis was conducted on 190 TDLBCL patients (123 primary, 67 secondary) treated across 22 Chinese institutions between November 2003 and November 2024. Clinicopathological data, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Targeted sequencing of 55 lymphoma-associated genes was performed on 49 tumor samples to characterize mutational patterns. Results: Primary TDLBCL patients exhibited significantly higher proportions (P<0.05) of the following favorable features compared to secondary cases: ECOG performance status ≤1(P=0.005), Ann Arbor stage I–II(P< 0.001), ≤1 extranodal involvement site(P< 0.001), normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P< 0.001), combined surgical resection and chemotherapy(P< 0.001), concurrent Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) (P=0.005), neck mass as initial presentation(P< 0.001), localized compressive symptoms(P< 0.001), absence of B symptoms(P=0.002), thyroid dysfunction(P=0.021), and maximum tumor diameter <6 cm(P=0.018). Among 175 evaluable patients, primary TDLBCL (91.0%,101/111) achieved superior objective response rates (ORR) versus secondary disease (73.4%,47/64) (P=0.002). For 108 patients receiving first-line rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP)-based therapy, primary TDLBCL demonstrated significantly improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (66.9% vs. 52.4%; P=0.018).Prognostic Factors:Univariate analysis of R-CHOP-treated patients identified extranodal involvement ≥2 sites(HR=2.185, 95%CI 1.011‒4.720), ECOG performance status ≥2(HR=2.378, 95%CI 1.039‒5.441), Ann Arbor stage III–IV(HR=2.262, 95%CI 1.046‒4.891), and elevated LDH (HR=2.690, 95%CI 1.178‒6.142) as significant adverse prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS), while maximum tumor diameter ≥6 cm (HR=5.788, 95%CI 1.436‒23.338) and double-expressor (DE) (HR=5.585, 95%CI 1.001‒31.150)(P=0.05) subtype detrimentally impacted overall survival (OS) (P<0.05); Multivariate analysis: Elevated LDH independently predicted inferior progression-free survival (HR = 2.690, 95% CI: 1.178–6.142, P = 0.019), while maximum tumor diameter emerged as an independent predictor for overall survival (model χ² = 8.587, P = 0.014), with tumors <6 cm conferring significantly reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.348, 95% CI: 0.159–0.759, P = 0.008). furthermore, genomic profiling revealed recurrent mutations in TP53 (30.6%), TET2 (30.6%), and KMT2D (26.5%), with TET2 mutational frequency differing significantly between primary and secondary TDLBCL subtypes (P=0.032), though none of these mutations demonstrated a statistically significant association with survival outcomes. Conclusion: Primary TDLBCL demonstrates superior survival outcomes and enhanced response to first-line therapy compared to secondary TDLBCL. Adverse prognostic factors significantly impacting patient survival include Ann Arbor stage III–IV, elevated serum LDH, extranodal involvement ≥2 sites, maximum tumor diameter ≥6 cm, and the DE phenotype.Serum LDH levels and tumor diameter serve as independent predictors for PFS and OS, respectively, underscoring their critical role in prognostication.Genomic profiling identified TET2, TP53, and KMT2D as the most recurrently mutated genes in TDLBCL; however, none of these genetic alterations exhibited a statistically significant association with prognosis.
Article Details
Authors (23)
Fei Li
Hao Sun
Guohui Cui
10Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
Ou Bai
10Department of Hematology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin, China
Shenmiao Yang
4Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
Zunmin Zhu
Peiqi Zhao
Keqian Shi
7Yunnan Provincial First People's Hospital, Yunnan, China
Keshu Zhou
3the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Siguo Hao
2Department of Hematology, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Jia Wei
State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedical Functional Materials, School of Chemistry and Materials Science, Nanjing Normal University
Hui Zhou
Department of Chemistry and Materials
Kaiyang Ding
2Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Xiangxiang Zhou
1Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, jinan, China
Honghui Huang
Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development, Ministry of Education, State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Eco-Environments and Bio-Resources of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University
Ting-Bo Liu
5Fujian Institute of Hematology, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Hematology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
Fan Zhou
Bing Xu
Aibin Liang
Shuye Wang
19The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
Ru Feng
Wenyu Shi
Wei Li Zhao
1Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China