Thromboelastography-guided platelet transfusion and associations with utilization and outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies.

R Rana Mohamed P Parnita Kesar (5East Carolina University, Greenville, United States) R Roshni Soni (1East Carolina University, Department of Internal Medicine, Greenville, United States) H Hatim Mustafa Saria (Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC) A Ahmed Hebishy (9East Carolina University, Hematology and Oncology, Greenville, United States) J Jinye Liu A Abdulrahman Al Kotob (4East Carolina University, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Greenville, United States)

Abstract

6590 Background: Thromboelastography (TEG) is a viscoelastic assay assessing clot formation and global hemostasis. In patients with hematologic malignancies, transfusion support is essential, yet evidence guiding optimal transfusion strategies is limited. This study evaluated transfusion utilization and outcomes associated with TEG use in hematologic oncology patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care hospital (October 2022–2025) including hospitalized patients with acute and chronic leukemias or multiple myeloma who received blood product transfusions. Primary outcomes were platelet transfusion utilization (standardized units) and platelet response. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality. Welch’s t-test and chi-square testing were used, with multivariable regression adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Results: Among 975 platelet transfusion episodes, 68 (5.3%) were TEG-guided. Unadjusted analyses showed slightly lower platelet utilization with TEG-guided transfusions compared with standard care (1.03 vs 1.06 units, p<0.001). Platelet count increments did not differ significantly (Δ 17.9 vs 16.3, p=0.57). TEG-guided patients had longer LOS (39.8 vs 31.9 days, p<0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (p<0.001), reflecting greater illness severity. After adjustment, differences in utilization, platelet response, and LOS were no longer significant. TEG use remained strongly associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 29.8, 95% CI 8.83–100.77, p<0.001). Conclusions: TEG use in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies receiving platelet transfusions was uncommon and not associated with improved transfusion efficiency or platelet response. TEG-guided transfusions occurred primarily in high-acuity settings with prolonged hospitalization and increased mortality, suggesting TEG functions more as a marker of illness severity than a routine tool for optimizing platelet transfusion. Further studies are needed to clarify its role in malignant hematology care. Platelet transfusion outcomes by TEG use in hematological malignancy encounters. Outcome TEG guided (n=68) Non-TEG guided (n=1214) P Value (unadjusted) P value (adjusted) Number of encounters 68 1214 --- --- Standardized platelet units, mean 1.03 1.06 0.14 0.34 Platelet count response (DELTA), mean 17.9 16.3 0.57 0.93 Length of stay, mean days 39.8 31.9 <0.001 0.51 In-hospital mortality, % 94.1 44.7 <0.001 0.0008 Adjusted p values from multivariable regression models including demographics, malignancy subtype, baseline platelet count, transfusion dose, care location, transfusion priority, and timing variables. DELTA = post-pre platelet count.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 6590-6590
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (7)

R

Rana Mohamed

P

Parnita Kesar

5East Carolina University, Greenville, United States

R

Roshni Soni

1East Carolina University, Department of Internal Medicine, Greenville, United States

H

Hatim Mustafa Saria

Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC

A

Ahmed Hebishy

9East Carolina University, Hematology and Oncology, Greenville, United States

J

Jinye Liu

A

Abdulrahman Al Kotob

4East Carolina University, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Greenville, United States