Three hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 subphenotypes and change in intubation or death over time: A latent class analysis with external and longitudinal validation

W William S. Stringer A Amy S. Labar J Joshua D. Geleris E Evan V. Sholle D David A. Berlin C Claire M. McGroder M Matthew J. Cummings M Max R. O’Donnell H Haoyang Yi X Xuehan Yang Y Ying Wei E Edward J. Schenck (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine) M Matthew R. Baldwin

Abstract

Background There are two subphenotypes of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome with differential responses to corticosteroids, but whether similar subphenotypes of hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 patients exist remains unknown. Objective To identify and validate non-critical COVID-19 subphenotypes at hospital admission that may elucidate pathobiology and facilitate heterogeneity-of-treatment effect analyses of clinical trials with non-critical COVID-19 patients. Methods We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 who were not intubated or did not die within 24 hours of admission. We derived and externally and longitudinally validated subphenotypes during the wild-type and delta severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) waves via latent class analysis using clinical and laboratory data at hospital admission. We trained XGBoost machine learning models to predict subphenotype. Results We analyzed data for 4,827 hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 patients: 2,077 wild-type wave Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) and affiliate hospital derivation cohort patients; 1,214 wild-type wave Cornell Medical Center and affiliate hospital external validation cohort patients; and 1,536 delta wave CUMC and affiliate hospital longitudinal validation cohort patients. A three-class latent class model best fit each cohort identifying subphenotypes that were low-inflammatory, intermediate-inflammatory, and high-inflammatory with fibrinolysis, with increasing 90-day risk of intubation or death across subphenotypes in the wild-type wave. However, in the delta wave, the intermediate-inflammatory subphenotype had the lowest 90-day risk of intubation or death. XGBoost model area under the receiver-operating-curve was 0.96 in the testing dataset, and biomarkers of inflammation and cardiorenal dysfunction were the strongest predictors of subphenotype. Conclusion We identified three hospitalized non-critical COVID-19 subphenotypes that persisted through the wild-type and delta SARS-CoV2 waves. The intermediate-inflammatory subphenotype had the greatest relative improvement in intubation and survival over time with the standardized use of corticosteroids and other interventions. Our machine learning model can facilitate heterogeneity-of-treatment effect analyses of clinical trials of adults hospitalized with non-critical COVID-19.

Article Details

Journal PLoS ONE
Volume / Issue Vol. 20, Issue 3
Published March 19, 2025
Pages e0316434
ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science

Journal Info

PLoS ONE

Public Library of Science

ISSN: 1932-6203 Open Access Health Sciences

Authors (13)

W

William S. Stringer

A

Amy S. Labar

J

Joshua D. Geleris

E

Evan V. Sholle

D

David A. Berlin

C

Claire M. McGroder

M

Matthew J. Cummings

M

Max R. O’Donnell

H

Haoyang Yi

X

Xuehan Yang

Y

Ying Wei

E

Edward J. Schenck

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine

M

Matthew R. Baldwin