Thermodynamic Limits to Molecular Doping in Conjugated Polymers: A Perspective on Phase Behavior and Miscibility
Abstract
ABSTRACT Molecular doping of conjugated polymers (CPs) is essential for advancing organic electronics yet achieving high and stable doping efficiency remains a significant challenge. While charge transfer, diffusion, and electronic and materials structure have been widely studied, the thermodynamic phase behavior that can fundamentally constrain doping efficiency and inform morphological stability, has received comparatively limited attention. This perspective provides an overview of the relevant thermodynamic aspects of doped CPs, including phase diagrams, miscibility limits, co‐crystal formation, interaction parameters, and structural transitions, and argues for an increased focus on thermodynamic concepts. We focus on the solid, rather than the solvated state. To illustrate how thermodynamics governs CP‐dopant miscibility, we draw on theoretical insights into the effective interaction parameter (χ eff ) for crystalline polymer systems and illustrate our arguments with experimental case studies from twelve model systems differing in sidechain chemistry, backbone structure, and energy levels. Grazing‐incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering is used to probe structural transitions, while time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry is used to estimate the binodal. We discuss evidence for upper and, for the first time, for lower critical solution temperature behaviors. The resultant thermodynamic perspective helps rationalize divergent behaviors across dopant–polymer combinations and provides guidance toward a generalized thermodynamic understanding that enables the co‐design of CP–dopant systems with improved doping efficiency and stability. We advocate that experimental determination of the dopant polymer‐phase diagram beyond the current, mostly heuristic approach and advanced modeling would greatly advance understanding and progress. We hope that this perspective will spark development of a comprehensive framework.
Article Details
Authors (11)
Somayeh Kashani
Department of Physics and Organic and Carbon Electronics Laboratories (ORaCEL)
Justin Neu
Department of Chemistry
Sung‐Joo Kwon
Department of Chemistry University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
Runqio Song
Department of Physics and Organic and Carbon Electronics Laboratories (ORaCEL) North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA
Zixuan Chen
State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry, School of Environment
Tajah Trapier
Department of Physics and Organic and Carbon Electronics Laboratories (ORaCEL) North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA
Paschalis Gkoupidenis
Department of Physics and Organic and Carbon Electronics Laboratories (ORaCEL) North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina USA
David Ginger
Department of Chemistry University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
Wei You
Department of Polymer Science and Engineering
Jasper J. Michels
Department of Molecular Electronics Max‐Planck Institute for Polymer Research Mainz Germany
Harald Ade
Department of Physics and Organic and Carbon Electronics Laboratories (ORaCEL)