The SPIN Score, a simple clinical score to predict pain response following celiac plexus radiosurgery for retroperitoneal cancer pain.

Y Yaacov Lawrence (Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel) M Marcin Miszczyk (Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria) D Dayssy Alexandra Diaz Pardo (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) A Artur Aguiar (Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal) D Dror Limon (Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel) M M. Raphael Pfeffer (Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel) M Michael Buckstein (Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY) A Aisling S. Barry (Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland) A Adam P. Dicker C Camilla Zimmermann J Jordan Kharofa (University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH) O Ofer Margalit (Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel) O Orly Yariv (Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel) O Ofir Morag (Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel) D David Hausner (Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel) M Maoz Ben-Ayun (Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel) T Talia Golan (Division of Medical Oncology Sheba Medical Center Tel Aviv Medical University Tel Aviv Israel) L Laura A. Dawson (Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada) Z Zvi Symon (Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel)

Abstract

4211 Background: Celiac plexus radiosurgery is a novel non-invasive palliative treatment for pancreatic cancer pain that was recently added to NCCN guidelines. In the pivotal phase 2 trial (NCT03323489; Lancet Oncol 2024;25:1070-79), pain response was 53% (95% CI 42-64%). Prespecified exploratory analysis identified age and BMI as predictors; however, no clinically actionable patient selection tool was developed. We sought to identify additional predictors and create a practical risk stratification score. Methods: Post-hoc analysis of 90 evaluable patients from the phase 2 trial. Pain response was defined per protocol (≥2-point reduction in average pain from baseline to three weeks, on Brief Pain Inventory–Short Form). Candidate baseline predictors were examined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Only variables remaining significant in multivariate analysis were included in the final score to ensure independence and avoid overfitting. Internal validation used bootstrap resampling (500 iterations with replacement) to calculate optimism-corrected AUC. Analysis performed using Stata IC/16.1. Results: Univariate analysis identified 4 significant predictors: neurotoxic chemotherapy exposure (OR 5.33, 95% CI 2.13-13.4, p<0.001), baseline pain intensity (OR 1.73, p=0.003), age (OR 1.06, p=0.014), and therapy line (OR 0.65, p=0.04). On multivariate analysis, only neurotoxic exposure (OR 5.1, p=0.009) and baseline pain (OR 1.8, p=0.003) remained independently significant predictors. Age and therapy line lost significance due to collinearity. Dose-response analysis confirmed pain threshold optimization: >5 (61.5% response), >6 (65.8%), >7 (83.3%), >8 (85.7%), with >6 providing optimal discrimination. We created the SPIN (Severe Pain + Intact Nerves) score (0-2 points): baseline Pain >6 (+1), No prior Neurotoxic chemotherapy (+1). Response rates by score: 0 points: 32% (n=31); 1 point: 53% (n=40); 2 points: 89% (n=19). The 2-variable model achieved an apparent AUC=0.716. Following bootstrapping, the optimism-corrected AUC was=0.714. Conclusions: The simple score allows identification of distinct patient subgroups with markedly different probabilities of pain response following celiac plexus radiosurgery. This suggests the intervention should be considered earlier in the disease course, before exposure to neurotoxic agents. External validation is needed prior to clinical implementation. Financial support: Gateway for Cancer Research, The Israel Cancer Association. Clinical trial information: NCT03323489 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4211-4211
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

Y

Yaacov Lawrence

Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

M

Marcin Miszczyk

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

D

Dayssy Alexandra Diaz Pardo

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

A

Artur Aguiar

Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal

D

Dror Limon

Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel

M

M. Raphael Pfeffer

Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

M

Michael Buckstein

Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY

A

Aisling S. Barry

Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland

A

Adam P. Dicker

C

Camilla Zimmermann

J

Jordan Kharofa

University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH

O

Ofer Margalit

Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

O

Orly Yariv

Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

O

Ofir Morag

Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

D

David Hausner

Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

M

Maoz Ben-Ayun

Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel

T

Talia Golan

Division of Medical Oncology Sheba Medical Center Tel Aviv Medical University Tel Aviv Israel

L

Laura A. Dawson

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Z

Zvi Symon

Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel