The role of salvage cystectomy after prior trimodality therapy.

N Nikolaos Pyrgidis (Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Munich, Germany) G Gerald Bastian Schulz (Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany) P Pietro Schilipoti (Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, Milan, Italy) F Francesco Pellegrino (Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, Milan, Italy) J Jozefina Casuscelli L Lazaros Tzelves (2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Athens, Greece) D Davide Ciavarella (Department of Urology, IMED Hospital, Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain) M Maria del Carmen Mir (Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain) T Tobias Klatte R Ramos Belinchon (Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain) J Jorge Caño Velasco (Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain) Y Yasuhisa Fujii (Department of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) H Hajime Tanaka S Soichiro Yoshida (Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan) P Paolo Umari (St. George's University Hospital, London, UK., London, United Kingdom) J Jeremy Y.C. Teoh (SH Ho Urology Centre, Hong Kong, Hong Kong) C Chris Wong Ho Ming (Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China) G Giuseppe Simone (Department of Urology, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy) R Riccardo Mastroianni (Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy) M Marco Moschini

Abstract

781 Background: Trimodality therapy (TMT) with transurethral resection followed by radiation of the urinary bladder and chemotherapy is associated with similar long-term survival rates compared to radical cystectomy (RC) for well-selected patients. Nevertheless, salvage RC may become necessary in 10% of patients receiving TMT. We aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes of salvage RC after prior TMT through a large multinational cohort study. Methods: We included patients with pure urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder. Patients undergoing salvage RC after prior TMT due to recurrence in the urinary bladder from 11 high-volume centers were matched with a propensity score matching on a 1:1 ratio with patients without prior TMT undergoing primary RC. The two groups were adjusted for institution, age, histological status, ASA score, and surgical technique. Results: We included 108 patients (54 per group) with a median age of 74 years (IQR: 66-78). The two groups did not differ in terms of operative time (TMT: 250 versus non-TMT: 251 minutes, p = 0.9), intraoperative blood loss (TMT: 550ml versus non-TMT: 600ml, p = 0.2), and perioperative Clavien-Dindo complications (p = 0.9). At a follow-up of 16 months (IQR: 6-38), 45 (42%) deaths occurred. Prior TMT was associated with higher mortality rates in the survival analysis (log-rank test: p = 0.037). Accordingly, the progression rates were higher in patients with prior TMT (log-rank test: p = 0.047). Conclusions: Salvage RC after TMT is associated with similar perioperative outcomes compared to primary RC. Nevertheless, patients undergoing salvage RC after TMT may present worse progression rates and overall survival in the long term. Therefore, systemic therapies should be considered in patients with recurrence after TMT.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 781-781
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

N

Nikolaos Pyrgidis

Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Munich, Germany

G

Gerald Bastian Schulz

Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

P

Pietro Schilipoti

Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, Milan, Italy

F

Francesco Pellegrino

Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, Milan, Italy

J

Jozefina Casuscelli

L

Lazaros Tzelves

2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Athens, Greece

D

Davide Ciavarella

Department of Urology, IMED Hospital, Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain

M

Maria del Carmen Mir

Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain

T

Tobias Klatte

R

Ramos Belinchon

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain

J

Jorge Caño Velasco

Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain

Y

Yasuhisa Fujii

Department of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

H

Hajime Tanaka

S

Soichiro Yoshida

Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

P

Paolo Umari

St. George's University Hospital, London, UK., London, United Kingdom

J

Jeremy Y.C. Teoh

SH Ho Urology Centre, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

C

Chris Wong Ho Ming

Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

G

Giuseppe Simone

Department of Urology, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy

R

Riccardo Mastroianni

Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy

M

Marco Moschini