The role of salvage cystectomy after prior trimodality therapy.
Abstract
781 Background: Trimodality therapy (TMT) with transurethral resection followed by radiation of the urinary bladder and chemotherapy is associated with similar long-term survival rates compared to radical cystectomy (RC) for well-selected patients. Nevertheless, salvage RC may become necessary in 10% of patients receiving TMT. We aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes of salvage RC after prior TMT through a large multinational cohort study. Methods: We included patients with pure urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder. Patients undergoing salvage RC after prior TMT due to recurrence in the urinary bladder from 11 high-volume centers were matched with a propensity score matching on a 1:1 ratio with patients without prior TMT undergoing primary RC. The two groups were adjusted for institution, age, histological status, ASA score, and surgical technique. Results: We included 108 patients (54 per group) with a median age of 74 years (IQR: 66-78). The two groups did not differ in terms of operative time (TMT: 250 versus non-TMT: 251 minutes, p = 0.9), intraoperative blood loss (TMT: 550ml versus non-TMT: 600ml, p = 0.2), and perioperative Clavien-Dindo complications (p = 0.9). At a follow-up of 16 months (IQR: 6-38), 45 (42%) deaths occurred. Prior TMT was associated with higher mortality rates in the survival analysis (log-rank test: p = 0.037). Accordingly, the progression rates were higher in patients with prior TMT (log-rank test: p = 0.047). Conclusions: Salvage RC after TMT is associated with similar perioperative outcomes compared to primary RC. Nevertheless, patients undergoing salvage RC after TMT may present worse progression rates and overall survival in the long term. Therefore, systemic therapies should be considered in patients with recurrence after TMT.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Nikolaos Pyrgidis
Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Munich, Germany
Gerald Bastian Schulz
Department of Urology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
Pietro Schilipoti
Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, Milan, Italy
Francesco Pellegrino
Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, Milan, Italy
Jozefina Casuscelli
Lazaros Tzelves
2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Athens, Greece
Davide Ciavarella
Department of Urology, IMED Hospital, Valencia, Spain, Valencia, Spain
Maria del Carmen Mir
Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
Tobias Klatte
Ramos Belinchon
Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain
Jorge Caño Velasco
Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, Madrid, Spain
Yasuhisa Fujii
Department of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Hajime Tanaka
Soichiro Yoshida
Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Paolo Umari
St. George's University Hospital, London, UK., London, United Kingdom
Jeremy Y.C. Teoh
SH Ho Urology Centre, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Chris Wong Ho Ming
Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Giuseppe Simone
Department of Urology, 'Regina Elena' National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
Riccardo Mastroianni
Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
Marco Moschini