The role of IPSS-m in predicting survival and relapse after allogeneic HSCT for MDS: A single center experience.

A Asmi Chattaraj (Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA) B Bana Antonios (3Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Pittsburgh, United States) G Gina Patrus (Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA) A Anna Koget (Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA) S Santhosh Sadashiv (3Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, United States) J John Lister (2Allegheny Medical Center, Pittsburgh, United States) P Prerna Mewawalla (3Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, United States) C Cyrus Khan (18Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, United States) Y Yazan Samhouri (Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ) S Salman Fazal (3Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Pittsburgh, United States)

Abstract

e18577 Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS), but the prognostic value of the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) for survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains unclear. This study investigates the predictive power of IPSS-M in determining survival outcomes following allo-HSCT for MDS patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of MDS patients who underwent their first allo-HSCT at our institution between 2018 and 2023, with available karyotypes and NGS data at diagnosis. IPSS-M risk scores were calculated, and patient characteristics and distribution are shown in Table 1. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 52 patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median age of 63.7 years; 75% were male. HSCT was performed after a median of 6.7 months from MDS diagnosis. Most patients (82.7%) underwent reduced-intensity conditioning, and 82.7% of HSCTs were from matched unrelated donors. After a median follow-up of 11.3 months (range 0.3 to 81 months), 1-year OS by IPSS-M risk categories were 66.7% (low), 33.3% (moderate-low), 80% (moderate-high), 45.5% (high), and 38.1% (very high). Additionally, t-MDS patients (n=10), regardless of their IPSS-M risk category, showed consistently poor outcomes, with a 1-year PFS of 38.1%. Conclusions: While survival varied across IPSS-M risk groups in our study, a consistent correlation with risk category was not observed, contributing to the ongoing debate regarding IPSS-M's prognostic value in MDS patients undergoing allo-HSCT. However, our findings underscore the consistently poor outcomes in t-MDS patients, regardless of their IPSS-M risk classification. These results highlight the need for further investigation into the prognostic significance of IPSS-M in this specific patient population. Due to the limited sample size of this study, larger cohorts are required to confirm these findings and provide more definitive conclusions. Baseline characteristics of the study population (N= 52 patients). Clinical Characteristics N (%) Sex  Male 39 (75%)  Female 13 (25%) Median age in years (range) 63.7 (28.5-73.9) IPSS- M  Very Low 0  Low 9 (17)  Moderate Low 6 (12)  Moderate High 5 (10)  High 11 (21)  Very High 21(40) Donor type  Related donor 9 (17.3)  Unrelated Donor 43 (82.7) Conditioning Regimen  Reduced Intensity 43 (82.7)  Myeloablative 9 (17.3)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

A

Asmi Chattaraj

Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

B

Bana Antonios

3Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Pittsburgh, United States

G

Gina Patrus

Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA

A

Anna Koget

Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA

S

Santhosh Sadashiv

3Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, United States

J

John Lister

2Allegheny Medical Center, Pittsburgh, United States

P

Prerna Mewawalla

3Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, United States

C

Cyrus Khan

18Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, United States

Y

Yazan Samhouri

Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ

S

Salman Fazal

3Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Pittsburgh, United States