The relationship of social support and psychosocial complexity with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy outcomes

J Jessica Nino de Rivera (Physiology Unit, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research (S.D.B., A.P.R., X.Z., M.A.H., L.A.R., R.L.S., M.J., J.N.d.R., A.J.M., J.M.J., R.O.E., N.T., K.L., H.C.A.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, MD.) S Shruthi Venkatachalam (2Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States) K Kyle Karpinski (3The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, United States) E Elane Kim (4Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States) A Anna Barata (1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States) M Meaghan Ekstrom (1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States) R Richard Newcomb (1Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) T Trisha Rahman (1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States) N Nova Hodge (1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States) L Lauren DeMarco (1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States) M Matthew Frigault (4Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States) A Areej El-Jawahri (1Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) P Patrick Connor Johnson (2Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Center for Lymphoma, Boston, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) is a transformative therapy for relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies with unique toxicities and complex logistics, including requiring a caregiver. Moreover, utilization of CAR-T is low with multiple barriers to access. Yet, no data exists examining CAR-T outcomes among those with limited social support and/or increased psychosocial complexity. Methods: We identified all adults undergoing CAR-T at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) from 6/2016-1/2025 using our institutional database. We excluded patients receiving a first-in-human CAR-T product or allogeneic products. Each patient underwent a systematic social work assessment to describe their psychosocial status prior to CAR-T. We retrospectively reviewed the social work assessment and any additional documentation in the electronic health record to identify extent of social support and psychosocial complexity. We generated a social support score incorporating the existence, availability, type of caregiver and whether they resided with the patient (SSS, 0-4, with higher scores equaling higher support) and a psychosocial complexity score incorporating the social support factors plus financial concerns, language barrier, substance use disorder history, unstable housing, transportation concerns, and other psychosocial concerns (PCS, 0-10, with higher scores equaling higher complexity). We utilized the median split to define limited social support and increased psychosocial complexity. We assessed the relationship between limited social support and increased psychosocial complexity with CAR-T toxicity (intensive care unit [ICU] admission, cytokine release syndrome [CRS] [yes vs no and grade 3+], immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS] [yes vs no and grade 3+] and length of stay [LOS]) using Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t-tests for LOS. We also evaluated the association of SSS and PCS with overall survival (OS) using multivariable Cox regression controlling for age, diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and location of CAR-T infusion (outpatient vs inpatient). Results: We identified 449 patients with a systematic social work assessment. The median age was 68 years (range: 23-94), and the majority were White race (84%), non-Hispanic ethnicity (87%), married/partnered (73%), and ECOG PS 0-1 (83%). The most common diagnoses were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (71%) and multiple myeloma (28%), and the majority of CAR-T was infused inpatient (67%). A plurality of patients received liso-cel (29%), followed by tisa-cel (19%), axi-cel (18%), and ide-cel (13%). On assessment, 5% of patients could not identify a caregiver, 13% had caregiver availability concerns, 4% had unstable housing, and 5% had substance use disorders. Overall, 24% of patients had financial concerns, 7% had transportation concerns, and 7% had other psychosocial concerns noted by social work assessment. The median SSS was 4, with 41% having a score below the median, and the median PCS was 1, with 38% having a score above the median. SSS below the median (compared to above median) was not associated with ICU admission (5% vs. 7%, p=0.69), CRS (76% vs. 77%, p=0.65), grade 3+ CRS (3% vs. 2%, p=0.76), ICANS (32% vs 39%, p=0.16), grade 3+ ICANS (14% vs. 17%, p=0.36), or LOS (17 days vs 17 days, p=0.87). PCS above the median (compared to below median) was not associated with ICU admission (6% vs. 6%, p=0.84), CRS (78% vs. 77%, p=0.73), grade 3+ CRS (3% vs. 2%, p=0.76), ICANS (33% vs 38%, p=0.27), grade 3+ ICANS (14% vs. 17%, p=0.51), or LOS (17 days vs 17 days, p=0.79). Neither SSS (HR 1.02, p=0.76) nor PCS (HR 0.98, p=0.71) were associated with OS. Conclusions: In a systematic social support analysis, a significant percentage of patients noted caregiver availability issues and/or financial concerns. However, neither limited social support nor increased psychosocial complexity were associated with increased CAR-T toxicity or worse survival, underscoring that psychosocial barriers should not limit access to CAR-T.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 4544-4544
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

J

Jessica Nino de Rivera

Physiology Unit, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research (S.D.B., A.P.R., X.Z., M.A.H., L.A.R., R.L.S., M.J., J.N.d.R., A.J.M., J.M.J., R.O.E., N.T., K.L., H.C.A.), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, MD.

S

Shruthi Venkatachalam

2Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, United States

K

Kyle Karpinski

3The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, United States

E

Elane Kim

4Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States

A

Anna Barata

1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

M

Meaghan Ekstrom

1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

R

Richard Newcomb

1Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

T

Trisha Rahman

1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

N

Nova Hodge

1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

L

Lauren DeMarco

1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

M

Matthew Frigault

4Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States

A

Areej El-Jawahri

1Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

P

Patrick Connor Johnson

2Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Center for Lymphoma, Boston, United States