The prognostic impact of prostate-specific antigen at 6 months after post-prostatectomy radiotherapy: An individual patient data analysis of two NRG oncology randomized trials.

O Osama Mohamad (Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) D David Michael Swanson (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) A Alan Pollack (University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL) H Himanshu Lukka (McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada) A Alan Dal Pra (University of Miami, Miami, FL) I Ian S. Dayes (Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada) A Andre-Guy Martin (CHU de Quebec, Quebec, QC, Canada) M Michael Greenberg (Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA) A Alexander G. Balogh (Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada) J Jeff M. Michalski (Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) P Peter Vavassis (Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada) A Adam D. Currey (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) R Robert Timothy Dess (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) J Jason A. Efstathiou (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) N Nirav S. Kapadia (Department of Radiation Oncology & Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH) S Samir Patel (Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada) B Belal Ahmad (London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada) H Howard M. Sandler (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) S Stephanie L. Pugh (NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA) P Paul L. Nguyen (Mass General Brigham, Boston)

Abstract

254 Background: We sought to evaluate the prognostic impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) within 6 months of completion of salvage radiotherapy (RT) in patients treated with RT with or without hormone therapy (HT). Methods: Individual patient data were obtained from 2 randomized trials (NRG’s RTOG 0534 and RTOG 9601) evaluating salvage RT with or without HT. HT was either androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 4-6 months or bicalutamide for 2 years. The lowest PSA recorded within 6 months after RT completion was identified and categorized as ≤ or >0.1 ng/mL. The primary outcomes were metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals to characterize the association of PSA within 6 months post-RT completion with OS and MFS while adjusting for age, Gleason score, trial, and HT use. Five-year MFS and 10-year OS rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Among a total of 2,373 patients, 1833 (77%) patients achieved a nadir PSA ≤0.1 and 540 (23%) did not. Among patients who did not get HT, 50% did not reach the milestone compared to only 6% of patients who got HT. PSA ≤0.1 ng/mL was associated with better OS (HR 0.27 [95% CI 0.12-0.6], p=0.001) and better MFS (HR 0.25 [95% CI 0.13-0.47], p<0.0001). The interaction test showed that the improved OS/MFS in patients who achieved the nadir was more prominent in those who did not receive HT compared to those who received HT. Five-year MFS rates among patients allocated to RT, RT+ADT, and RT+ bicalutamide were 94% vs 81%, 92% vs 87%, and 91% vs 93%, respectively, based on PSA ≤ vs >0.1. Ten-year OS rates among patients allocated to RT, RT+ADT, and RT+ bicalutamide were 87% vs 76%, 84% vs 84%, and 82% vs 83%, respectively, based on PSA ≤ vs >0.1. Conclusions: PSA >0.1 ng/mL within 6 months was prognostic for OS and MFS in patients treated with salvage RT in the post-prostatectomy setting. This finding allows better patient counseling and can guide clinical trial design for treatment intensification or de-intensification in patients receiving salvage RT.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 254-254
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

O

Osama Mohamad

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

D

David Michael Swanson

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

A

Alan Pollack

University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL

H

Himanshu Lukka

McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

A

Alan Dal Pra

University of Miami, Miami, FL

I

Ian S. Dayes

Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada

A

Andre-Guy Martin

CHU de Quebec, Quebec, QC, Canada

M

Michael Greenberg

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA

A

Alexander G. Balogh

Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada

J

Jeff M. Michalski

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

P

Peter Vavassis

Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

A

Adam D. Currey

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

R

Robert Timothy Dess

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

J

Jason A. Efstathiou

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

N

Nirav S. Kapadia

Department of Radiation Oncology & Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, NH

S

Samir Patel

Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada

B

Belal Ahmad

London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada

H

Howard M. Sandler

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

S

Stephanie L. Pugh

NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA

P

Paul L. Nguyen

Mass General Brigham, Boston