The prevalence and clinical significance of clonal monocytosis

W William G. Dunn M Michael C. Sachs (4Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark) M Matteo Maggi (5Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy) M Muxin Gu P Pedro M. Quiros K Kiran Batta (8Epigenetics of Haematopoiesis Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom) C Christen Lykkegaard Andersen M Margarete A. Fabre T Timothy Chevassut I Irina Mohorianu D Daniel H. Wiseman (7Cancer Research Division, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain) G George S. Vassiliou

Abstract

Abstract The terms clonal monocytosis of undetermined significance (CMUS) and clonal cytopenia and monocytosis of undetermined significance (CCMUS) were introduced by the International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms to describe cases of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and concurrent monocytosis that did not meet the diagnostic criteria of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. To date, their practical relevance as clinicopathological entities at a population level has not been assessed. Here, we assess the prevalence, significance, and natural history of CMUS and CCMUS among 431 531 UK Biobank participants through analysis of clinical, genomic, and health outcome data. We find that CMUS with an absolute monocytosis and CCMUS are high-risk entities strongly associated with incident myeloid neoplasia (MN), cardiovascular disease, and renal disease. Noting the overall higher monocyte counts in men and the low rate of progression of DNMT3A-CMUS, we reveal that amending the definition of CMUS/CCMUS to incorporate sex-specific monocyte thresholds and the exclusion of isolated DNMT3A mutations from the definition significantly strengthens the association with incident MN. Finally, given their association with poor outcomes, we develop MoSAIC, a machine-learning classifier, to infer the presence of SRSF2 mutations (associated with high MN risk) among individuals with monocytosis, based on complete blood count indices alone. We corroborate our findings in an independent cohort of 625 328 Danish primary care patients. Our findings underscore the clinical relevance of CMUS and CCMUS as distinct high-risk states within the spectrum of CH and establish an evidence base to refine their diagnostic definition.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 147, Issue 25
Published June 18, 2026
Pages 3039-3050
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (12)

W

William G. Dunn

M

Michael C. Sachs

4Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

M

Matteo Maggi

5Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

M

Muxin Gu

P

Pedro M. Quiros

K

Kiran Batta

8Epigenetics of Haematopoiesis Laboratory, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

C

Christen Lykkegaard Andersen

M

Margarete A. Fabre

T

Timothy Chevassut

I

Irina Mohorianu

D

Daniel H. Wiseman

7Cancer Research Division, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain

G

George S. Vassiliou