The presenting symptoms of patients with appendiceal malignant tumors.

A Andreana Natalie Holowatyj (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) R Rebecca Babyak (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) R Rachel A Francis (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) F Fei Ye D Deepa Magge K Kira Soldani (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) D Deborah Shelton (ACPMP Research Foundation, Silver Spring, MD) K Kamran Idrees (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) R Rajiv Agarwal (Division of Nephrology, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis) C Christina Edwards Bailey (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) K Kristen Keon Ciombor (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) C Cathy Eng (Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville) D Dana Backlund Cardin (Vanderbilt Univ. Medical Center, Nashville, TN) T Thatcher Heumann A Aimal Khan S Shannon L McChesney (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) R Robert A. Ramirez (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) C Cameron Schlegel (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) M Mary Kay Washington (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN)

Abstract

824 Background: Timely detection of appendiceal malignant tumors is a clinical priority because of the propensity for this malignancy to metastasize to the peritoneal cavity. Up to one in every 2 patients with this rare tumor type will present with distant metastatic disease, owing to there being no standardized screening tests for early detection of primary appendiceal cancers. Case reports have pointed to broad/non-specific symptoms of patients diagnosed with appendiceal malignant tumors, yet information is needed from large cohorts to support prompt/accurate clinical diagnoses. Methods: We analyzed data from patients with a pathologically-confirmed first primary appendiceal malignant tumor (AC) who prospectively enrolled in the nation-wide Genetics of Appendix Cancer [GAP] clinical cohort study (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05734430) between November 2022 and May 2024. The primary outcome was presenting symptoms that led to AC diagnosis. Symptom effects and interactions with diagnosis age/year, sex, body mass index (BMI), and tumor histology, were quantified with negative binomial regression models and presented as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Of the 352 patients included in our analyses (median [IQR] age, 51.0 [42-59] yr), 77.6% were female and 96.6% had an adenocarcinoma histology. Seventy-seven percent of patients (n=270) reported one or more presenting symptoms, of whom 55.2% (n=149) experienced these symptoms for 3+ months prior to diagnosis. On average, patients reported 3 symptoms (mean: 2.9, SD 3.0). The most prevalent symptoms among males and females were abdominal pain (57.1%), bloating/distension (32.1%), pelvic pain (18.5%), and abdominal/pelvic mass (18.2%). Overall, patients with early-onset AC [age<50] more commonly presented with symptoms versus cases with late-onset AC (82.9% vs 71.7%, p =0.01). This finding persisted in adjusted models—the number of symptoms was highest among younger patients, rapidly decreased and plateaued around age 50 (IRR 0.97, 95%CI 0.95-0.99, p =0.002), and slowly increased again with older age (IRR 1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.05, p =0.037). Patient sex was also significantly associated with symptom number, as males had a lower rate of symptoms versus females (IRR 0.63, 95%CI 0.48-0.83, p =0.001). In contrast, histology (IRR 1.03, 95%CI 0.53-2.02), diagnosis year (IRR 1.01, 95%CI 0.99-1.04, p =0.35) and BMI (IRR 1.01, 95%CI 0.99-1.02) were not associated with symptom number in adjusted models. Conclusions: In a large nation-wide cohort, three of every 4 patients were symptomatic prior to primary AC diagnosis. Compared to the rapid time course of acute appendicitis, over 40% of this population presented with symptoms for 3+ months prior to AC diagnosis. The higher symptom burden among young patients and females supports the need for clinical providers to keep occult appendiceal tumors in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting in this manner.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 824-824
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

A

Andreana Natalie Holowatyj

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

R

Rebecca Babyak

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

R

Rachel A Francis

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

F

Fei Ye

D

Deepa Magge

K

Kira Soldani

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

D

Deborah Shelton

ACPMP Research Foundation, Silver Spring, MD

K

Kamran Idrees

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

R

Rajiv Agarwal

Division of Nephrology, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis

C

Christina Edwards Bailey

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

K

Kristen Keon Ciombor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

C

Cathy Eng

Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville

D

Dana Backlund Cardin

Vanderbilt Univ. Medical Center, Nashville, TN

T

Thatcher Heumann

A

Aimal Khan

S

Shannon L McChesney

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

R

Robert A. Ramirez

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

C

Cameron Schlegel

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

M

Mary Kay Washington

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN