The presentation of brain metastases by breast cancer subtype and potential implications for surveillance brain MRIs.

R Rashmi Sarawagi (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) V Vaseem Khatri (Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) M Matthew Mills (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) R Rituraj Upadhyay (H lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL) D Daniel Eli Oliver (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) A Aixa Elena Soyano Muller (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) R Roberto Diaz (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) I Iman Washington (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) M Michael Yu H Hatem Hussein Soliman (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) H Hyo S. Han K Kamran A. Ahmed (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL)

Abstract

e13101 Background: As systemic therapy improves, the prevalence of breast cancer brain metastases(BCBM) is increasing. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network(NCCN) guidelines do not recommend breast cancer brain MRI surveillance unless suspicious central nervous system(CNS) symptoms are present. We sought to understand the presentation and outcomes of BCBM by subtype. Methods: Breast cancer patients who developed brain metastases(BM) at our institution between 2015 and 2025 were identified. Details of initial presentation, treatments delivered and overall survival(OS) were assessed. Kruskal-Wallis and Pearsons's chi-square tests were used to test differences between subtypes. OS was calculated from dates of initial BM diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis (MVA) to identify variables prognostic for OS. Results: A total of 426 patients were identified including 176(41%) hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2-, 133(31%) HER2+, and 117(27%) triple negative (TN). HER2+ patients were younger at initial presentation (HER2+ median age: 55, TN: 56, HR+/HER2-: 57, p = 0.03). TN patients had the shortest interval from stage IV diagnosis to BM diagnosis (TN median: 10.4 months, HER2+:12.6 months, and HR+/HER2-: 16 months, p = 0.0005) and cancer diagnosis to BM diagnosis (TN median: 26.8 months, HER2+: 27.8 months, and HR+/HER2-: 54.7 months, p < 0.0001). The median lines of therapy in the stage IV setting at BM diagnosis were HER2+:1, TN:2, and HR+/HER2-:3, p < 0.0001. TN patients were most likely to present without evidence of systemic metastases (TN:25.6%, HER2+:19.6% and HR+/HER2-:13.1%, p = 0.02). TN patients were less likely to have liver metastases at the time of their diagnosis (TN:19%, HER2+:44% and HR+/HER2-:44%, p < 0.0001). TN patients were more likely to undergo surgical resection at the time of their BM diagnosis(TN: 28%, HER2+:22%, HR+/HER2-:16%, p = 0.05) while HER2+ patients were more likely to present with > 20 BM at diagnosis (HER2+:21%, TN:11%, HR+/HER2-:10%, p = 0.04). Median OS following BM diagnosis was 38.1, 11.6 and 9.1 months, p < 0.0001, for HER2+, HR+/HER2- and TN subtypes. On MVA, TN subtype(p < 0.0001), presence of leptomeningeal disease(p = 0.0007), presence of > 20 BM(p = 0.0013), > 2 lines of systemic therapy (p < 0.0001), and symptomatic intracranial presentation(p = 0.004) were significant for worse OS following BM diagnosis. Conclusions: Our institutional analysis found significant differences in presentation of brain metastases by breast cancer subtypes, with TN patients presenting earlier in their diagnosis and undergoing surgical resection more commonly. On MVA, > 20 brain metastases, leptomeningeal disease, and symptomatic presentation predicted for worse OS. These findings potentially support early brain MRI surveillance to facilitate detection.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

R

Rashmi Sarawagi

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

V

Vaseem Khatri

Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

M

Matthew Mills

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

R

Rituraj Upadhyay

H lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

D

Daniel Eli Oliver

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

A

Aixa Elena Soyano Muller

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

R

Roberto Diaz

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

I

Iman Washington

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

M

Michael Yu

H

Hatem Hussein Soliman

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

H

Hyo S. Han

K

Kamran A. Ahmed

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL